• HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
    ·
    11 months ago

    The same person can be a customer at Walmart, a worker at Walmart, and a shareholder/owner at Walmart. Class as a Marxist concept maybe made sense when you could only be a worker or an owner. But it doesn’t work in a world where you can seamlessly switch between categories, or be all of them at the same time.

    these people have rocks in their skulls

      • Adkml [he/him]
        ·
        11 months ago

        Liberals and making arguments already explicitly disproven by books they refuse to read, NAMID.

    • Adkml [he/him]
      ·
      11 months ago

      "Oh you have $60 in stocks in a company, that makes you a capitalist." - people who say we don't understand economics

    • Rom [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I want to see this dork seamlessly switch between Walmart greeter and Walmart owner. Just do it, if it's that easy.

    • D61 [any]
      ·
      11 months ago

      ...and a shareholder/owner at Walmart...

      Oh boy... somebody's gonna lose their shit when they hear about the different types of "shares" a company can buy/sell/trade.

    • NotErisma
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

        • NotErisma
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Lmao, it was something to the effect that the bazinga brain believed that social mobility was as pliable as bubblegum, but actually it was their brain that had the consistency of bubblegum.