Image is of Stepanakert, essentially the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. It is now a ghost city, and Azerbaijan has recently torn down the parliament building and various other important places. Sourced from this article.


Despite the predictions and assertions of various NATO-aligned commentators that Russia's influence is waning, the opposite generally appears to be occurring. ASEAN has become more strongly aligned with Russia despite claims to the contrary. In Central Asia, there has been a propaganda push to declare that countries there are "emerging from Russia's shadow", while in reality, as Bhadrakumar analyzes, Russia's significant economic growth and ongoing march towards victory in Ukraine is creating opportunities for further integration, not separation, and there are no major political shifts there in terms of Russian ties. And in Niger, Russian soldiers have now entered an airbase which once hosted American soldiers, now kicked out, and generally Russia's diplomacy and economic deals (nuclear power plant construction, military equipment, grain shipments, etc) have accelerated in Africa.

Where Russia's influence has actually seemed to decrease (outside of the West, of course) is in Armenia. Nagorno-Karabakh's remarkably rapid collapse in late 2023 demonstrated that Russia was not willing to escalate things in defense of Armenia to fend off Azerbaijan. One hundred thousand Armenians - most but not all of them in the region - fled in advance to avoid mass persecution, which received remarkably little attention by a West which calls itself overwhelmingly concerned with borders changing due to military action as in Ukraine. Since then, Armenia seems to be on some kind of self-annihilating bender, allured by the potential of Western military and economic deals. Armenia froze its membership in the CSTO due to its failure to protect them, and the head of NATO, Stoltenberg, visited the region in March. The West has offered up hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance to Armenia and is helping them "modernize their military"; given the poor track record of Western military equipment in Ukraine, one wonders why they're even bothering. RAND has advocated for a balancing act; America should, in their eyes, realize that they can't entirely remove Russia's influence but nonetheless should make inroads to protect Armenia from Azerbaijan (which is an interesting position given that Israel provided arms to Azerbaijan to help them take Nagorno-Karabakh).

A quick look at Armenia's geographical position reveals the folly of trying to create some kind of Western outpost. With a hostile Azerbaijan to their east, a very unfriendly (albeit NATO member) Turkiye to their west, an ascendant Iran to their south, and Russia not far from the action, there is little hope of doing much more than causing a little chaos in the hopes it'll momentarily distract Russia while it makes inroads most everywhere else on the planet. The political situation appears miserable for Pashinyan, but there isn't really a popular alternative to take the reins. A truly cursed situation.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is Armenia! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
    ·
    4 months ago

    IOF goon got owned so hard by a sniper he almost got ignited in flames. But seriously, how are the rifles doing that?
    https://twitter.com/IranMilitaryNet/status/1789003111945658857

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]M
      ·
      4 months ago

      All I can think of is that the round hit something thats contains explosive/flammable on his plate carrier. I honestly have no idea what it could be unless he's a dumbass that had some kind of canister of flammable and volatile liquids or compressed gas.

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]M
          ·
          4 months ago

          Tracers are too risky and they don't make a flame like that, unless it hit something volatile and flammable. There's also incendiary and HEI rounds but those are risky, rare, and hard to manufacture.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            4 months ago

            My best guess is the round was incendiary and hit one of the soldier's magazines, and what we're seeing is the cordite cooking off from ruptured ammunition.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]M
              ·
              4 months ago

              There'd be less fire if that was the case. Ammo doesn't exactly just goes up in flames if it's hit nor does it rupture into flames when cooked off imo

              • Frank [he/him, he/him]
                ·
                4 months ago

                What else would be likely? Flare? smoke grenade? i'm trying to think what pyro the guy could be carrying that would do that. I think smoke nades are solid compositions and I don't think they'd flare like that. I'd think it would need to be a powder of some kind.

                It'd be hilarious if it was an incendiary round and it torched his tactical non-dairy creamer powder or something.

                • Alaskaball [comrade/them]M
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I'm coming up with nothing too. I'm just going to think the dude had a canister of tactical hair spray

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        4 months ago

        I thought that too, at first, but there's also dust coming off the top of his vest near his shoulder, so it's possible it hit higher up. I don't think we have enough detail to say for sure, except that he's having a bad day.

    • D61 [any]
      ·
      4 months ago

      Could have hit a magazine on the troop with tracer rounds. Maybe they were carrying a flare, incendiary grenade, or demolition grenade. Video does go on long enough to see what the fire does or how long it lasts.

      Probably not a phosphorous grenade, not enough smoke.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My off the cuff guess would be a large caliber armor-piercing incendiary round. The bullet has a little hollow in the back of it filled with phosphorous or something that ignites when the round is fired. It's also possible the round ignited the powder in some of the soldier's ammunition or something. Dude's probably boned though you're not supposed to have fire coming out of you.

      Actually looking at this a few times, I'm not sure if hte guy actually got got. I can't tell just where the round landed, but he didn't drop immediately from something that either produced that much fire or made something on his vest violently flame out, so it's possible he caught it in the plates and lived, at least for a while. probably not very happy though. It's very, very difficult to defeat plates with small caliber rounds. Any .50 caliber/ 12.7mm round would do it, but I have a hard time imagining someone staying on their feet after a 12.7 round punches a half-inch hole in their armor and sends all the shrapnel through their torso and in to their rear plate where it would bounce again.

      Kinda highlights the issues with analyzing these videos. We don't know what was shot at him, we don't know the range, we don't know what kind of armor he was wearing, we don't know what happened after the video stops.