The weirdest thing is that there is like 0 reason to do the weird math analogy. It adds nothing. It would be like saying "this is like a butane molecule, because it is made up of many smaller parts". Completely unnecessary. All this says is "sins are equally bad so if you have more it is worse".
I don't know shit about math but this makes a lot of sense to me.
The weirdest thing is that there is like 0 reason to do the weird math analogy. It adds nothing. It would be like saying "this is like a butane molecule, because it is made up of many smaller parts". Completely unnecessary. All this says is "sins are equally bad so if you have more it is worse".
deleted by creator
But muh vectors
ALSO, about that "non-sinful origin point"... HAVEN'T YOU HEARD OF THE ORIGINAL SIN? IT LITERALLY HAS ORIGIN IN THE NAME
deleted by creator
I mean, this is about people, right? Like, modern people.
deleted by creator
Well, maybe that just counts like a coordinate transformation. Or going into another vector space.
deleted by creator
Tldr let's do a "points system" for sins, where every sin can be constructed out of a relatively small subcategory of sins.
I am very intelligent.