deleted by creator

China has been unwilling to challenge the dollar with yuan

IMO this is actually a good thing for socialism and potentially signals China's long-term commitment to it. Of course it would also be great if the dollar were replaced, but replaced with what is very important.

If the yuan were internationalized, China couldn't impose the kind of strong capital controls which have allowed it to develop the economy toward socialism while retaining markets to a (likely necessary) degree. Further, there would be much greater incentive to export capital internationally rather than use it domestically, which could lead to a kind of social imperialism.

The synthesis of maintaining capital controls and dehegemonizing the dollar IMO is that the dollar is replaced not by another single nation's currency (which is just a different kind of unipolarity, after all), but instead by an international currency like the Bancor proposal.

(A dual-circuit thing like the USSR under Stalin would be better for transitioning away from money itself ofc, but I have no clue how that would work across borders and it seems impossible that any capitalist countries would accept such a system. If the world got to that point, socialism as a world-system would have practically already won)

I love your posts assuming you're the most recent alt but good lord this is just silly

We’re also seeing that either the Chinese government has less control over its own banks than we previously thought

Russia and China aren’t going to collapse lol. But it does mean that the critical window to challenge the US hegemony has passed. We are slowly returning to the “status quo”, in quotation marks because everything will only get worse from here and unlikely to avoid the consequences of climate change.

This whole talk about the optimal time for dedollarization is ultimately cope that anti-imperialism/decolonialization/counter-hegemony will be a largely bloodless affair. If only it were so easy that the US will be dislodged from its throne from fiscal decisions.

We’re also seeing that either the Chinese government has less control over its own banks than we previously thought, or they believe that the economic benefits of trading with Western countries still far outweigh a closer relationship with Russia (a very tiny economy compared to the collective West), indicative of their inability to wean off an export-oriented economy.

My hunch is that it’s the later. It tracks with all the other moves China has made in recent years, where trade with the west is prized over potentially harming that trade with “hostile” moves like de-dollarization.

the critical window has not arrived yet. every other cycle of accumulation has undergone a gradual geographic transition of the core only after the extant capitalist system was thoroughly in the process of collapsing in on itself, heralded mostly by a withering in overall trade volume and corresponding with widespread conflict and a retreat into everyone's respective national economies

so basically, we're waiting for the us to sanction/declare war on china

in the meantime, so long as the powers behind the us political classes remain incapable of formulating a new framework of hegemony, the dollar will only continue to decline, taking the world economy along with it

Or there is the simple fact that China allied with the west during the cold war and is viewing America's sudden interest in domestic chip production as a quiet preparation for surrender of Taiwan.

But it does mean that the critical window to challenge the US hegemony has passed.

there was never a "critical window" imo, it was always going to be a gradual process just like the transition between the sterling and the dollar was. and even that wasn't a process of linear gains; things went the dollar's way until the Great Depression fucked it over and then it seemed like the pound might be there to stay, and then WW2 starts and things turn against the pound again, etc.

honestly I should write something up at some point about how the pound sterling (and the gold standard, once you reach the 1970s) fell once I've completed more reading, I think it's a fairly comparable process. hell, maybe something on the whole British Empire.

we are on our 'its so over' arc

Personaly climate change is still the main issue. The data showed the COVID lockdowns were similar to what would be necessary to avoid 1.5C.

At the bare minimum if you wanted to be "civil" about it, we would need global governments to completely enforce a survival mode only economic system, no economic activity beyond the stritcly necessary.

On that front China should absolutely be praised as they're literaly the only ones improving massively, but unfortunately its not enough, the longer we take the more drastic measures would be necessary. Crazy to think but its 2025 already and literaly all projections followed the "worst possible" or "Unexpected" projection lol.

A large part of my frustration is that our past revolutionary comrades never predicted or had to deal with such a hard deadline. Lenin, Mao or Castro etc, none of them were told "if you fail humanity will die in less than a generation".

And it is this lack of urgency that is worrysome. I realy couldn't care less about Chinese or Soviet "diplomacy" towards the US if the year was 1955 and all we fantasized was FALGSC in the year 2000.

Instead its 2025 and we count how many different climate disasters are going to happen within the next 10 years.