(i ripped this off wikipedia real fast so sorry if it's lib)
In October 1776, the Public Universal Friend contracted an epidemic disease and was bedridden and near death with a high fever. Their family summoned a doctor from Attleboro, six miles away, and neighbors kept up a death-watch at night. The fever broke after several days. The Friend later reported that [deadname redacted] had died, receiving revelations from God through two archangels who proclaimed there was "Room, Room, Room, in the many Mansions of eternal glory for Thee and for everyone". The Friend further said that [deadname redacted]'s soul had ascended to heaven and the body had been reanimated with a new spirit charged by God with preaching his word, that of the "Publick Universal Friend", describing that name in the words of Isaiah 62:2 as "a new name which the mouth of the Lord hath named".
From that time on, the Friend refused to answer to their deadname, ignoring or chastising those who insisted on using it. When visitors asked if it was the name of the person they were addressing, the Friend simply quoted Luke 23:3 ("thou sayest it"). Identifying as neither male nor female, the Friend asked not to be referred to with gendered pronouns. Followers respected these wishes; they referred only to "the Public Universal Friend" or short forms such as "the Friend" or "P.U.F.", and many avoided gender-specific pronouns even in private diaries. When someone asked if the Friend was male or female, the preacher replied "I am that I am", saying the same thing to a man who criticized the Friend's manner of dress (adding, in the latter case, "there is nothing indecent or improper in my dress or appearance; I am not accountable to mortals").
editorial note: I think this is a very cool story and I really love hearing it. We've been around forever and we've been doing variations of this forever. It's really beautiful
Join our public Matrix server! https://matrix.to/#/#tracha:chapo.chat
As a reminder, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.
Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.
Also to be real, when Doctor Funnyman is playing around with reanimating corpses into states of excruciating pain and such, it should be framed as fuckin awful/terrifying but it seems like the movie wants to have it as a gag. Also even though it's thankfully all animatronics, that's too much animal abuse tbh, which again the film kinda thinks is a joke?
Yeah with these things it's a fine line and I can turn my brain off to some things but others stack up. Re-animator is a black comedy so I get it but I think it goes into tasteless territory for me and unfortunately you do get that with the genre.
cw violence etc
A cop getting blasted because he thinks he's a cowboy and getting his bones shoved into an exoskeleton to be a cop-bot is good black comedy. Resurrecting a cat that's been hit by a car is not good black comedy, Re-animator scriptwriter
cw violence
Yeah I enjoyed the black comedy in RoboCop and the brutality, shame it's a cop film.
Animal cruelty isn't fun.. I don't enjoy when things touch on it either.. I have no issues with that scene in robocop tho.