Like, the amount of times you hear this is mind boggling. And it’s always liberals/“leftists” who say they’re not racist.

“But I just don’t find them attractive.”

You have NOT seen/interacted with literally every single member of that community. How in the fuck can you just broadly say you aren’t attracted to them?

It’s just a preference.

Like, you’re literally saying you don’t find people of a specific race, or from a specific place, or who follow a specific religion attractive. What the fuck kind of “preference” is this? I don’t understand. That’s terfs saying they don’t find “trans” people attractive. No that’s terfs being literal terfs. Stop it.

I’m a POC too! I can’t be racist against my own race!

Yeah, you are being racist against your own race here. I don’t see why you can’t. Candace Owens regularly spreads anti-Black propaganda for her personal benefit. There are countless such examples.

This shit drives me up the wall. And I haven’t even mentioned the amount of times these devolve into arguments about how ___ race/religion is actually bad and people who are a part of it/follow it are bad. So. Many. Times. And said with a straight face too! By people who say they’re not racist or xenophobic. For some reason people think being a POC means you’re immune from being racist/xenophobic. Which just isn’t true.

I’m not saying your bad for feeling this way. A huge part is the culture we’re born in and grow up in. But a sign of maturity is recognising this ingrained racism and getting rid of it.

Sorry, just sometimes liberals get on my fucking nerves.

  • purr [undecided]
    ·
    4 years ago

    thats true and i definitely agree with you. I guess when i was zeroing on the fuckability part, I wasnt trying to come at it from an incel narrow blinders angle, i was trying to point out how being considered less fuckable as a whole compared to others makes people feel bad about themselves sometimes

    • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
      ·
      4 years ago

      And most often, "being considered less fuckable" is just a lie that we tell ourselves in our own heads.

      There are lots of different kinds of humans, and lots of different combinations of preferences people can have. As part of the homogenization of culture over the past several decades, the idea of what is conventionally attractive has been presented as the only way to be attractive. This loss of variety has hurt everyone.

      • purr [undecided]
        ·
        4 years ago

        uh i dont know if its just a lie there really are swaths of people due to fatness, disability, racism etc who dont get to participate in the sexual market place. there are people who never have sex/ close romantic relationships or whatever other sexually and emotionally satisfying things because of this. they might be found attractive by someone but in these cases, nobody has ever shown interest and theyve been told that they are unfuckable constantly regardless of whether its true.

        So regardless of if theyre fuckable, lonely sexless relationship-less people exist and some of that is due to marginalizing factors they cant control

        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
          ·
          4 years ago

          There is scarcely any adult demographic that is sexless besides asexuals and people with injured or absent genitals.

          Many people have it harder, but that doesn't mean it's impossible.

          • purr [undecided]
            ·
            4 years ago

            https://www.joe.ie/life-style/amount-men-30-not-sex-nearly-tripled-past-decade-663846

            https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/the-sex-recession/573949/

            eh i think theres more sexless people than we think, and again just because its possible for people to have sex doesnt mean its happening, hence the alienation. , and again, if injured or absent genitals prevents people from participating in the sexual marketplace (assuming they want to ) that is bad in itself and is exactly some of the alienation im talking about, an alienation that is partially based on having marginalizing identities/experiences that are considered unattractive/ unfunctional within society's normative sexuality (which is genital based, cishetero based, penetrative based and able-bodied based among other things)

            also its kinda weird how you think that those with injured or absent genitals being sexless is a logical conclusion to their condition...like this is exactly what im talking about, non normative people being made to sit in the corner, unable to participate in sexuality (specifically a sexuality that centers around genitals) due to the assumption from normies that they dont want to have sex/ cant have sex / and that that's okay because its what one can expect if they have injured or absent genitals