I don't have all the links I had saved on reddit anymore so I'm trying to get ahead of the next struggle session and I think it would be beneficial for everybody if we planned it out ahead of time. We should at least figure out what it will be about and when it should start. Any ideas? I was thinking we should do something a little bit different than the usual.

  • Utopia [none/use name]
    6·
    4 years ago

    Brb killing a living being for literally no reason. The vast majority of people do not need to eat small game, or any meat, in modern day society.

      • Utopia [none/use name]
        1·
        4 years ago

        But the difference is animals can suffer and are actually aware they are alive

          • Utopia [none/use name]
            2·
            4 years ago

            I have a lot of respect for Jainism, ahimsa is badass.

            However if you seriously want to argue that a completely thoughtless chemical response to stimuli in a lifeform with no nerves or nervous system, nevermind a brain, is the same as suffering from animals with actual nervous systems then you must be arguing in bad faith (or you're joking in which case sorry for the rant lol)

            • the_river_cass [she/her]
              ·
              4 years ago

              ehh keep in mind, the Jains live the way they do because of their relative class/caste position. they literally hire servants to sweep the road in front of them so they don't accidentally step on bugs. without the labor of people who do kill, their philosophy would be much harder to put into practice.

              a version of the same that also barred exploitation? that would be interesting but possibly also bar you from cultivating food to eat.

              • Utopia [none/use name]
                ·
                4 years ago

                That's a good point to be fair, I guess that's something they had no concept of when they were thinking of that stuff, although I guess a rotting body does also support a lot of life in the bacteria that eat it, which I guess some of which would be the bactiera that are already on/in you?

                With regards to a nervous system, it isn't inherently better however for the argument of veganism it is what allows suffering to occur, according to all the science we know to date. Killing things without nervous systems that are (probably) incapable of suffering will reduce the amount of suffering in the world when compared to killing things that can suffer.

                Even if plants did suffer, eating them over animals would still reduce total suffering because 90% of energy is wasted as you move up every trophic level. And so by us eating plants directly, rather than us eating animals that eat plants, we actually eat fewer plants anyway.

                • it_that_follows [none/use name]
                  5·
                  4 years ago

                  Not to get too broad but you're also working from the assumption that all suffering is bad, which seems obvious in normal conversation, but needs to be supported in order to be used as a basis for your ethical model.

                  If, let's say (Ben Shapeeno style), that some suffering is either good or necessary, you would need to give a reason as to why eating animals is ethically wrong other than simple suffering avoidance.

                  • CatherineTheSoSo [any]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    Eh, I've read a bit on metaethics and without using something as god as authority it either ends up treating ethical statements as subjective fiction or postulating "self-evident" axioms like "suffering is bad".

                    • Utopia [none/use name]
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      ends up as ... postulating “self-evident” axioms like “suffering is bad”.

                      Yes.

                      • CatherineTheSoSo [any]
                        1·
                        4 years ago

                        I mean, I agree. I'm just pointing out that "prove to me that suffering is bad" doesn't end up being a productive "facts and logic" conversation even among philosophers.

            • eduardog3000 [he/him]
              6·
              4 years ago

              Just that if you had a choice, you wouldn’t do it.

              For what reason? They aren't people, the same morality doesn't apply.

                • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                  7·
                  4 years ago

                  Basically, yeah. Though "sapient" is probably the better term to use than "human".

                    • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                      8·
                      4 years ago

                      I don't care. That's the point. If it isn't sapient I don't care.

                        • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                          7·
                          4 years ago

                          It's arbitrary, and idc that it is. We should probably leave dolphins alone, since they are on the line, but cows, pigs, chickens, nope.

                            • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                              8·
                              4 years ago

                              somehow the animals that are already factory farmed don’t aren’t worth caring about. Pretty convenient, right?

                              Almost like people before us have had a chance to think about the sapience of animals for a long time, and have decided which are ok to farm. And I don't disagree with the choices they've made.

                              You aren’t convincing anybody but yourself that there’s good reason to not extend compassion for animals.

                              I'm not trying to, I'm saying the "compassion" argument is bullshit because I think it's bullshit. I care much more about the environmental argument, which is why I made a post with more effort about it as compared to the offhand comment I originally made for this thread.

                                • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                                  7·
                                  4 years ago

                                  I didn't say culture or tradition. I said the ethics have been decided by people before us, and that I don't disagree with those ethics. I recognize that existing ethics that I disagree with need to be changed. But this is not one I disagree with.

                                  That's why "conveniently" the animals being factory farmed are the ones that are ok to farm.

                                  Still waiting on a response about the EPA source. Like I said, I don't actually care about the ethical argument.

                    • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                      6·
                      4 years ago

                      None of this makes animals sapient. No shit they have some level of conscious. You have to decide a cutoff somewhere, we disagree as to where that is.

          • UranicTomcat [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            Bacon is way overrated it's legit just sodium, no complex flavors or anything besides flavors that are added to it. Just like lick salt or something lmao