In my view, almost certainly. Read "Green Capitalism: The God that Failed" to get a sense of how liberal democracies have completely mishandled the environmental crisis. Almost no American gives a rat's ass about the climate, and they would probably rally behind whatever far-right charlatan who promises to maintain their lifestyle no matter how many bullets or night disappearances it takes.
NB: I'm extremely doomer, but I nonetheless think my assessment is correct it's just too horrible for most people to acknowledge.
whats the difference between eco-fascism and killing someone because you dont have enough water/too much water
Mostly the amount of flags and armbands involved.
Certain, No, likely, yes. Inevitable is not a dialectical position.
But also Ecofascism isn't sustainable either, it's simply the lower stage of "Common ruin of the contending classes" and is not an irreversible state either.
Sort of a sidenote but I feel like a lot of environmentalist activists completely fail to acknowledge that ecofascism even exists in any significant way, let alone the fact that it's only going to grow in strength and popularity as climate change worsens.
I just have a bad feeling the 21st century is doomed to be exponentially more bloody than the 20th. Once climate change starts displacing hundreds of millions, the global north will be looking for any excuse to spill a sea of blood.
Eco-Marxism would require more brainpower than we know is in the system so yeah it's the only option left, sorry
