Redfish should stop watermarking their memes/infographics. Makes it so you can't share it without the libs going "ummm sweaty, that's Russian propaganda"
Copy image into photoshop.
Vaguely highlight section you want to replace using lasso tool, no precision necessary just circle it.
Edit>Fill>Content Aware>Ok
It's that easy.
Download a torrent client, go to piratebay, search for photoshop, sort by seeders and get the one with the most seeders.
This works for acquiring almost anything. Everything is cracked. From software to videogames, though some games now take a while because anti-piracy side of the equation in the game industry has gotten very good.
In some countries you may want a vpn too, but in many countries it's entirely unnecessary as there's absolutely zero pursuit of downloaders, only people who are creating the pirate content itself.
In some countries you may also need to look up a "piratebay proxy" because piratebay itself is blocked by DNS. This is just an extra step to accessing piratebay and barely a nuisance though.
You could always cover up the watermark with something else if that's a concern.
https://i.imgur.com/mwMrOSy.png
Comrade Kirk is spreading BDS sentiment on university campuses everywhere.
comparing these in any meaningful way is kinda a stretch.
Palestine was a legit sovereign nation recognized by its neighbors and the world through Britain making it so. Then Britain after making it a nation decides 20 years later to split it up
Natives on the other hand were not a uniform nation, did not have meaningful international recognition and were colonized and effectively destroyed before the Civil War
While yeah, 2 genocides are both genocides with putting ethnic minorities on small “reservations”, they don’t really go beyond that imo.
Palestine has FAR larger geopolitical consequences
Didn’t the French, Spanish, and Russians also do a fair amount of land theft in North America?
this image specifically shows the US, and the other counties didn't care about how the natives were treated by other imperial powers, mostly the same as the US obvi.
the image shows the western half being native land (as in not stolen) in 1850 when a lot if it would've been taken by Spain and then Mexico
A lot of what is now the United States was never really colonized during the time that it was still part of France or Spain or Mexico's empire. Arizona, Utah, Colorado, large parts of Texas/Oklahoma and th plains states were largely de facto Native land until the Americans showed up.
That's true. But the Spanish definitely has a precense in California for example
:wut: How does anything you listed make them different? They're both pretty cut and dry land theft. Other nations interacted and traded with indigenous American nations up until the US settlers were in large enough numbers to start forcing people off their land. I don't think any differences really make this graphic wrong.
