AMA

C/unpopular opinion

  • MorelaakIsBack [comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    imo the number isn't the problem, it's that if you're looking for something specific but don't know what it's called then you have to browse through the itty bitty eye-strain-o-vision emoji list

    • SerLava [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      There is a built in tagging system that we can utilize if the devs get time. One of them confirmed it was possible. You can already do it with standard emojis- each one shows up for various keywords

      This comes up for "cool" but is called : sunglasses : and "Smiling face with sunglasses" 😎

      we might want to collaborate in a google doc because theres so many. create like 2-5 alternate ways of describing the thing, so it'll show up.

  • Wojackhorseman2 [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    :slaps-roof: *slaps the roof of hexbear * this baby can fit so many emojis in it

  • TillieNeuen [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Oh yeah? check this out--

    before an abundance of emojis: :alex-no-supplements:

    after an abundance of emojis: :alex-supplements:

    You really can't argue with the science.

    • comi [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      That I agree with, some names are a little weird

    • SerLava [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      that one can be tagged with "sinema" to show up for that keyword. also "thumb" or "thumbs down"

  • Cherufe [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    :thanos We must get rid of half of the emojis so that the rest can thrive

  • kissinger
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator