Totally normal question to ask, regular poll choices

  • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    When I was in grad school, my advisor used to respond to any question that began "Imagine a possible world where.." by just stopping the questioner and saying *no, I'd rather not."

    gigachad-hd

    • FourteenEyes [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      8 months ago

      Imagine a world where you didn't have to listen to these stupid questions

  • Timberknave
    ·
    8 months ago

    Imagine the american president is 100 years old and dying of dementia. His last wish is one more genocide. Is it ethical for the Zionist Entity to do one?

  • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    if i ever hear someone say the phrase "free speech" again I'm dunking their head in the toilet

  • TeddyKila [comrade/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    sneerclub had a moratorium on threads about her because she posts like this with fulltime dedication

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Too unsubtle about what the rest of the "grey tribe" wants.

          • GinAndJuche
            ·
            8 months ago

            I wonder if he chuckled when he realized he could just shove Ron Paul in front of anything he wanted if he kept the last letter the same. Amazing wordplay.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The most euphoric STEMbros I've ever known insisted they were superior artists, poets, and writers to anyone in the humanities because the humanities taught nothing of importance that STEM couldn't produce with STEMlogic alone smuglord

              Look upon the works of STEMlogic, ye underwater basket weavers, and despair smuglord

              • GinAndJuche
                ·
                8 months ago

                An increasingly hingeless tech bro trying to apply the golden ratio to sentence structure and create the mathematically perfect novel.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The CEO of "Soylent" bragged about developing a perfect dating algorithm that would ensure he would get laid by choosing the correct things to say in offline "dialogue trees." cringe

                  • GinAndJuche
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I bet that dude thinks Persona is an accurate representation of how to make friends. Jfc

                    • UlyssesT [he/him]
                      ·
                      8 months ago

                      I've met people that actually fucking said that: that the Secular Calvinist Protestant Work Ethic, Animoo Edition shit pushed in some of those games was actually a basis for how to date and how to live life. You know, hustlegrinding their way to a harem that mysteriously doesn't seem to happen without hiring sex workers or going to magical rich people islands. epsteingelion

            • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              8 months ago

              I deliberately try to do that with various politicians for shits and giggles, e.g. Joedolf Bidler, Donaldolf Drumfler, Vladimirdolf Putler.

              • GinAndJuche
                ·
                8 months ago

                That’s at least 5x more effort than Ron paulf the grey.

  • Magician [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    The infinite potential of the human mind and these fools are trying so hard to find justifiable ways to engage in csa.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      The fantastical Singularity(tm) of eternal life and godlike superpowers must maintain 1950s grillman aesthetics, including the normalization of hurting children.

  • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    8 months ago

    It was already a really weird hypothetical, then it just got weirder. Why do they always have to make it weirder?

    • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I suppose it's just what happens when your brain is uncucked and can finally unleash its full power.

      Or something.

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Reality has a radical bias so you can't really rely too heavily on it to argue for reactionary ideas. Instead they construct elaborate thought experiments and try to reason themselves into the position they want to arrive at from first principles. Being disingenuous jackasses that reasoning always ends up being deceptive and irrational.

      • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        8 months ago

        Good point, a lot of the most hardcore "true believers" in this stuff are extremely good at rationalising their own shitty behaviour and making themselves feel like they've "figured it out" when all they really did was find a bunch of vaguely intelligent sounding excuses.

  • GinAndJuche
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hypotheticals were a mistake.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Get a capital-R "Rationalist" talking long enough and they will eventually talk about any conceivable scenario where they think it might be okay to harm children. libertarian-alert

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If you frame it as “terms of a consensually signed contract” they’ll agree that just about anything is acceptable.