Psychology has a repeatability problem. Turns out Zimbardo wasn’t completely honest about how hands-off the researchers were. The Stanford Prison Experiment is the latest famous experiment in psychology that is proving difficult to reproduce.
I remember learning about this in school and the point being driven home: humans are selfish, and the only thing holding society together is a fragile veneer of civility, ready to burst free the moment no one is looking.
What does a selfish human species imply about society? It means that any vision of a community-oriented society, any revolution or reformation that purports to progress beyond a free capitalist market system in order to end capitalist exploitation, is naïve — nay, illogical.
Science has long been regarded as a pure discipline, abstracted from any particular society because of its faithful empiricism. Leftists ought to keep in mind that science, as with all knowledge, has a social character which cannot be separated from its time and place, and not therefore from politics. Science is a tool which may be wielded for technological progress within an egalitarian society, but by the same token may be used to lend authority to a ruling class who almost exclusively possess the means by which that science is carried out.
”[T]he human essence is no abstraction inherent in each single individual. In its reality it is the ensemble of the social relations.” —Karl Marx, Theses on Feuerbach
And it's really funny because they were basically just LARPing cops and robbers and doing what they thought they were supposed to do. And somehow it gets taught as gospel truth to laypeople. Most "experiments" in the 70s were just college kids and barely older than them professors doing drugs and crimes.
his wikipedia page:
“Philip George Zimbardo is
Can’t believe this mf is still alive lmao he was the host for a bunch of the videos we watched in psychology class
As a mayo psych researcher, I wish I could say this wasn’t true, but I also hate most psychology research and discourse. Not all fields are as bad as others, but god damn is a lot of psychology regressive
I’m several years into grad school, and every year I spend more time reading critical theory from sociologists or political theorists, and less time reading psychological research 🤷
more time reading critical theory from sociologists or political theorists, and less time reading psychological research
You've probably read this, but I'm linking it because it has a sources list.
https://www.hamptonthink.org/read/capitalism-and-mental-health
I just remembered what pushed me over the edge with my research actually, lmfao. i was at a conference about suicide (content warning, but i'm not really talking about sui in detail) research,
There was a researcher originally from China (but whose been based in the US for several decades now) that was presenting about how suicide-rates in China had decreased by 75% throughout the 1990's and 2000's, while rates increased around the world by ~30%. In the talk, he was explaining how this reduction was driven by a combination of changing material and social conditions: In a single lifetime, people who were born into deep poverty, who were raised in far away rural areas with little to no technology are now living in major metropolitan areas that rival the West's best cities. At the same time, there's been all kinds of social and cultural shifts about gender norms, self-determination, etc..
I was so interested in this talk, and i felt like all signs were pointing towards some kind of leftist or left-ish conclusion, but then it never happened. His talk just fizzled out. I asked him after the talk: What can Americans working in suicide-prevention, whether its front-line crisis workers or workers involved in policy, learn from his research? Does he think there is anything we in America/Canada can learn from China about how to rethink or reshape our economy to prevent suicide, e.g., uplifting the poor and/or reducing poverty and inequality? And he gave a super lib answers like "keep improving the economy" and "fund fossil fuel, keep driving your car", [keep the imaginary line going up]"
i don't think i've come across that yet, but i'm excited to read it now, thank you!
compared to before finding my groove/niche, i feel 1000x better about my education/career trajectory, but i also think i've grown 1000x times more annoying to some people in my department, lol
Any psychology research done by a krakkker is sus
s/psychology/medical in general
based
it really does need to all be re-evaluated and mostly redone from the ground up
also not just done by them, but done on them. Like even if the results were true, that just says that mayos are fuckin comically selfish like no offense dude we knew that
Basically everything I got taught in Psych 101 was a lie, who would've guessed
Zimbardo appears to recognize this in his book about the experiment The Lucifer Effect, the thesis of which is that there aren't "bad apples" so much as "bad barrels," i.e. otherwise normal people can turn sociopathic in situations where sociopathic behavior is normalized or expected. Even assuming that the experiment was good science (it wasn't), the conclusion that it represents evidence that humans are inherently cruel and selfish seems like a major misinterpretation of both the researchers' hypothesis and their findings.
otherwise normal people can turn sociopathic in situations where sociopathic behavior is normalized or expected
Israel.
Settler colonialism is the “bad barrel”
some of the frivolous ones are useful to establish a baseline or better understand the processes occurring. All that makes it out in the headlines is some tedious shit but it's useful to know how animals react to things, and dogs to treats is a pretty good place to start before doing weirder shit.
The other thing people point to is the prisoner dilemma - ignoring that the payoff matrix is under our control, we can build a payoff matrix/society were collaboration and solidarity are the only rational choices regardless if it's "human nature" to be selfish.
the prisoners dilemna in repeated encounters changes dramatically as well
also the prisoners dilemna takes two assumed self interested parties and places them in a zero sum situation where cooperation is disincentivised and uses that as proof humans are self centred. It already assumes the thing it is being used to prove
There are countless times humans have sacrificed themselves and their rational self interest for the benefit of another
One time in college (in a freshman bio lab of all places) they split us into groups to do a prisoner's dilemma exercise without actually calling it that, which I think was supposed to demonstrate something about intraspecies competition (I've forgotten tbh). I recognized it for what it was and went to each group, explaining the concept and how we would be best off overall if we cooperated, and just to trust me that my group wouldn't screw them over. And it worked! Granted, a lot of that is probably just due to people thinking, "Man, this guy is being really intense about a dumb participation credit lab, I don't want to make this into a whole thing," but regardless, everyone cooperated through all the rounds and we maximized our reward (in this case, candy). Trivial, sure, but it's something I'm proud of.
In school they sorta paired this with Lord of the Flies when we were reading that one. There really wasn't any examination of the context in which it was written and how it was more a critique of how British boys would sail off to do horrible things in the colonies and come back as "real men" but with nobody to brutalize they split themselves and brutalized each other. Saw a few videos on the experiment a while ago where the 'researchers' would encourage awful behavior and tell people to keep going even when they were uncomfortable in doing it. It was such a fabricated study. Plainly Difficult has a lot of interesting looks at some awful science that's outright criminal and immoral.
when a group of boys was shipwrecked in real life, they helped each other
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/may/09/the-real-lord-of-the-flies-what-happened-when-six-boys-were-shipwrecked-for-15-months
That was a really good read, thanks for sharing it.
Also,
They were finally rescued on Sunday 11 September 1966.
Lmao
The boys went to Catholic school. Clearly the moral here is that protestants are evil.
The sample always seemed really biased. Of course a bunch of shitty, rich white dudes from Stanford would be assholes to each other. They all probs went on to have great careers eviscerating the working class and throwing Black people in prison at genocidal rates.
every game 'journalism' site ever tried to make this same point when RUST came out (the crappy MMO survival game not the programming language or whatever), ignoring that your life in the game has no inherent value (its just a matter of re-obtaining resources, you respawn) and you can leave and come back any time, and the effect that might have on people's behaviors. everyone wants to explore the limits of what a game will let you do, because its all harmless fun. in a survival situation things are different, no one wants to die permanently or have their kids die permanently with no respawns of a minor infected bruise or cut after a fight when there's no hospitals and no political or practical reasons to do so. its pretty much always better to cooperate in survival situations, and with the exception of pre-existing ethnic conflict this holds pretty true for human behavior in real life disaster scenarios.
Its like if the word used to describe losing a sports match was "die" and you said you "killed" the other team if you win. Then folks acted like that said something about the human condition in life and death situations.
Maybe not the conclusion that society or people at large but I bet coming to the conclusion that Stanford students are inherently selfish would at least be a little more accurate one
Fuck Stanford students
There was a study that claimed that if you aren't WEIRD (Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic) psychology is basically pseudoscience. It even goes further to say that if you're a mainline liberal psychology has better outcomes for you.
I hate these "scientific" proofs that capitalism, as the pure ideology that it is, is in fact objectively correct and true as our economic system. Because like so much propaganda masquerading as science, even this study was exactly that at its root, even if saying it indirectly.
Tweak the conditions properly and you can make any stupid ass theory look valid. And economics is the academic study of how to make an insane system of capitalism not look insane but viable. Back in the day we had the village shaman telling us the chief was talking to spirits and the divine leader or some bullshit lol. Now we get Larry summers as our priest king and the invented nobel prize in economics to act as the replacement of divine right as society is more secular
the main thing it points out is that we desperately need prison reform
I don't think they teach SPE after the first psych 101 module in the first sem of undergrad, experiments like that and the Milgram experiments are the reason ethics approval board exists and became a necessity.
Psychology has a repeatability problem
Research in general does, but yeah, there are a lot of biases involved that need to be controlled for in psych experiments. Turns out measuring objective correlates of subjective behavior isn't so easy after all.
And when it does appear in intro psych courses, it's almost always in a "this was fucked up we can never let this happen again" type of way, though I doubt they really explore all the ways that it was fucked up, nor how that study and its cultural impact continue to do harm
most of the time they act like the problem was that the thin veneer of society was removed, and not that a researcher did some bad shit for no reason.
I really don't get what was wrong with the milgram experiment. You don't get to whine your conscience acted up if you didn't say no in the first place. They were bad people and they should feel bad an experiment exposed that.
nice
