Ridiculous that the media goes along with calling her a "historian". She is a journalist. Her background is in journalism, not history, and it shows. But she likes to call herself a historian and no one questions it. Actual historians like Kotkin and Tauger have dunked on her Ukrainian famine book. And most people who are not historians but talk history (like Mike Duncan and Dan Carlin) will always emphasize the fact that they are not historians. Because they respect the work the actual historians do.
To think Applebaum is still treated as a credible historian
Ridiculous that the media goes along with calling her a "historian". She is a journalist. Her background is in journalism, not history, and it shows. But she likes to call herself a historian and no one questions it. Actual historians like Kotkin and Tauger have dunked on her Ukrainian famine book. And most people who are not historians but talk history (like Mike Duncan and Dan Carlin) will always emphasize the fact that they are not historians. Because they respect the work the actual historians do.
here is one of said dunkings for everyone
Review of Anne Applebaum’s “Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine”
Applebussy