If you're going to organize food for your local homeless folks or other people in need of mutual aid, you're going to give them beef jerky? As opposed to actual nutritionally dense food?
Lord almighty, I'm using an example of something that's already existing, is free, and available. You know most people with limited access to food don't have a lot of options for nutritionally dense food, let alone vegan choices right? Have you ever been to what passes for a market in a food desert?
My question is: if the animal has already been killed, is it better to eat that animal or throw it in the trash?
If the animal has been killed, give them a proper burial. Don't commodify their corpse as a snack.
So I should bury the the beef jerky? Rather than donate it to the some local homeless folks or other mutual aid?
If someone raped and murdered me, would it be wasteful not to donate my corpse to homeless folks?
I'm not saying we should eat people, but if it came to it and my body could keep people from going hungry, dig in.
Yeah, that's called consent. Animals that we rape and murder for their labor and flesh did not consent to any of that. It's not food, it's violence.
Besides, it's a leading question you pose. You can donate food (read: from plants) to folks instead of corpses.
I encourage you to go read my pinned post of vegan marxist theory, and also go read the resources in the sidebar.
If you're going to organize food for your local homeless folks or other people in need of mutual aid, you're going to give them beef jerky? As opposed to actual nutritionally dense food?
Fuck outta here with your bad faith arguments.
Lord almighty, I'm using an example of something that's already existing, is free, and available. You know most people with limited access to food don't have a lot of options for nutritionally dense food, let alone vegan choices right? Have you ever been to what passes for a market in a food desert?
lmao
FOOD DESERTS
DO NOT ENGAGE ME BAD FAITH ARGUER
Removed by mod
I seem to remember asking you to disengage.