Well actual scientists don't seem to be falling for the grift en masse yet, so specifically looking at consensus of experts and not journalists with an axe to grind seems promising.
Class, but of course it could be there was some scientist hungry for some live animals/wanted to make some observations. Un-disprovable as I’ve said, but the scientist would continue infect at work presumably (as covid infection rate is out of this world), so it would look (I think) differently
Yeah I can't say I follow that logic either. I thought I was on the other covid news thread of the day tbh. I think that one was much more thorough in giving an argument against the lab leak theory. This in particular is written weird, and is about a study that hasn't gone to peer review yet.
Well actual scientists don't seem to be falling for the grift en masse yet, so specifically looking at consensus of experts and not journalists with an axe to grind seems promising.
deleted by creator
Look at fig.1
deleted by creator
I mean scientist is unlikely to go into wet market, but sure, it’s inherently disprovable theory
deleted by creator
Class, but of course it could be there was some scientist hungry for some live animals/wanted to make some observations. Un-disprovable as I’ve said, but the scientist would continue infect at work presumably (as covid infection rate is out of this world), so it would look (I think) differently
deleted by creator
But then you sit in the office, eat in cafeteria, sit in your home :ohnoes:
Well second part is mutation part, but it’s more involved
deleted by creator
Yeah I can't say I follow that logic either. I thought I was on the other covid news thread of the day tbh. I think that one was much more thorough in giving an argument against the lab leak theory. This in particular is written weird, and is about a study that hasn't gone to peer review yet.
deleted by creator