why the FUCK would anyone do a HUMANE GENOCIDE

wow the fertility rate dropped by 1% when adjusted for east asian trends? they still have a fertility rate higher than the rest of east asia? that is truly evil! surely the rate will continue to fall until uighurs are all phased out! just you wait, itll only take around 100 years for that to happen if the rate continues to drop! a very humane genocide taking 100 years, which has nebulous benefits? sign everyone up!

  • flowernet [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    the 2020 book The War on The Uighurs is really badly written and lays out of a lot of interesting contradictions. For example, education is at once both widely imposed on uyghurs to assimilate them, but also too exclusive and inaccessible, keeping them marginalized. they cite as evidence the fact China has reduced the number of free points Uighurs get on national exams from 50 points to 15, which if that was the case it wouldn't make sense to give them preferential scoring at all. but then this argument becomes even more confusing, because he goes on to say when the brightest Uighurs do get accepted they are being assimilated by attending schools with mandarin classes and han schoolmates (and every university in China has a Halal Canteen). In short the CCP is keeping too many Uyghurs from enrolling in the schools that are being used to erase their identity.

    text

    " A more disturbing campaign to change the Uyghur human terrain involves the educational system in the Uyghur region. While the process of making the schools in the region teach exclusively in Chinese had been underway since the early 2000s, changes in 2017 served to create one education path of assimilation for a few of the brightest Uyghurs while promoting a path of marginalization for the majority. As for all students in China, Uyghurs’ educational and career paths are determined by their performance on a nationwide exam taken between eighth grade and high school. Those who pass are given a standard academic high school education, and those who do not are relegated to vocational schools. While the transition to all-Chinese-language instruction had already required Uyghur students to take this exam in Chinese and attend high school or vocational training in the Chinese language, affirmative action programs encouraging the integration of Uyghurs into PRC society had long given them a 50-point advantage on their test grade. In 2017, this advantage was slashed to 15 points, thus dramatically reducing the number of Uyghurs attending academic high schools.107

    As a result, high schools in the Uyghur region now have a much higher proportion of Han students, providing for a more assimilation-ist experience for those Uyghurs who do get admitted. Furthermore, since such schools are mostly located in urban areas, the rural Uyghur students who do get admitted must study in boarding school environments, which further separate them from their culture and language.108 For those who do not get admitted, they are generally relegated to the new system of coerced labor connected to the internment camps through the ‘surplus rural labor’ program and its ‘reeducation lite’ curriculum or sent to work and be simultaneously re-educated in larger factories in inner China. Thus, whichever path they are afforded, this system assumes that their future will be much less ingrained in Uyghur culture than that of their parents "

    another very funny section is where he discusses Xinjiang Preschools, and desperately tries to read something sinister into the statistics that China is building exactly enough daycares for the number of students that are expected to enroll (Preschools were overcrowded by 400,000+ students previously), because it must be all their parents are in prison and they need new facilities to keep their children in custody.

    text

    " Adrian Zenz has done ground-breaking research on this subject and has found that Chen Quanguo’s administration may have had plans for massive forced intergenerational separation even prior to the establishment of the mass internment camps. According to Zenz, Chen had already established in his first month in office a plan to institute universal preschool for the children of the Uyghur region within the course of a year.109 However, the actual implementation of this plan not surprisingly corresponds with 2017, the year that mass internment began. By late February 2017, the government began construction of 4,387 preschools that were intended to serve 562,900 new students, particularly in the south of the Uyghur homeland, with a completion deadline before the beginning of the 2017–2018 school year.110 While this goal itself appeared ambitious, it is noteworthy that during the 2017–2018 school year, the number of children enrolled in preschool was far greater than this target. While the total preschool intake target for the region in fall 2017 had been around one million, the actual number enrolled was closer to 1.4 million.111 Furthermore, Zenz suggests that a substantial number of these new preschool students appeared to attend institutions with the capacity to house boarding students from a very early age. "

    • TeethOrCoat [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      For example, education is at once both widely imposed on uyghurs to assimilate them, but also too exclusive and inaccessible, keeping them marginalized.

      Why is it always the same pattern?

      • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Because it's not meant to make sense, it's meant to be "woke" in order to get squishy succdems to hate China. Language like "assimilationist" or the idea that Uyghur students going to school with "too many" Hans reeks of someone trying to get your lizard brain (we're all nothing but trendy ass radlib posers here, let's keep it :100-com: ;) ) to draw parallels to black students in the American education system and hint at the residential school system with zero context for Xinjiang's actual situation.

        • TeethOrCoat [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Appreciate the mini effort post 😄. My comment was actually a rhetorical question referencing Michael Parenti's words on anti-communism.

    • ssjmarx [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      China is building exactly enough daycares for the number of students that are expected to enroll

      Xi Jinping, my country yearns for freedom rational economic planning.