I like to find the beauty and charm of every single city while telling people whats good and bad about my own city and trying to draw similarities between our cities as a form of fraternity while celebrating the differences.
Nah, Boston is gorgeous, the buildings and sidewalks are pretty, there's a lot of public green space, and the river and harbor are both gorgeous, and it's a lot less of a tech bro dystopia than SF
Just cause Chicago is pretty doesn't mean Boston isn't prettier. The Charles has more green space along its banks, it's not just wall-to-wall skyscrapers, and the harbor is part of a real ocean 😤
Plus the buildings are older and the sidewalks are often brick with marble curbs instead of ugly concrete. At least we can agree that SF is not the nicest city in the states
!["[San Francisco] is a very dark place with incredible despair and pain" -- this isn't about a lack of social services, it's about public sex](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/v4BUqZu95A.jpg){kind=link}
Weird way of spelling Chicago.
Lol Chicago is training wheels for midwesterners who want to play Big City™ .
new york trash detected.
I like to find the beauty and charm of every single city while telling people whats good and bad about my own city and trying to draw similarities between our cities as a form of fraternity while celebrating the differences.
:downbear:
Wierd way of spelling Bakersfield.
The least beautiful city in North America is Gray, Indiana, which is the correct way to spell what is commonly known as Gary, Indiana.
I looked it up, holy shit these are depressing images.
I've only driven through, so I just looked it up myself. The fact that they were literally founded by U.S. Steel explains a lot.
Cedar Rapids, IA has to be a runner up - 2 buildings that aren't hideous, and one of them is a federal courthouse, so not a good sign.
I know, I've never seen Boston spelled that way before
Ma'am pls don't embarrass yourself. You're wrong.
Nah, Boston is gorgeous, the buildings and sidewalks are pretty, there's a lot of public green space, and the river and harbor are both gorgeous, and it's a lot less of a tech bro dystopia than SF
I mean c'mon look at these: https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/ETZW8Fo4Wi.jpg
https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/ngfRAx7ouT.jpg
The architecture, the skyline can't be compared when you visit. And the lake. So fucking beautiful.
Chicago comrade, posting to agree.
I mean, https://tobyharriman.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Boston-Charles-River-Aerial-Photography-Downtown-1.jpg
https://frugalfrolicker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/wpid7087-sailing-boston-harbor.jpg
Just cause Chicago is pretty doesn't mean Boston isn't prettier. The Charles has more green space along its banks, it's not just wall-to-wall skyscrapers, and the harbor is part of a real ocean 😤
Plus the buildings are older and the sidewalks are often brick with marble curbs instead of ugly concrete. At least we can agree that SF is not the nicest city in the states
You're all incorrect Oildale, California is far superior to whatever crab-infested hellmouth's you all live at
:left-unity-2:
:solidarity:
downvote
You're both spelling Philadelphia weird
All Philly has is cheesestakes and disappointment.
Wrong :tromp:
You're really defending Philly rn. :agony-shivering:
Jk lol, I haven't been there so I can't say shit forreal.