at the risk of sounding like a broken record, this quote is relevant
Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.
Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?
Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.
from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/
The idea that China isnt socialist is one of the most bizarre narratives crafted by western countries and regurgitated by western leftists here. Losurdo has a good essay on this that I always recommend.
https://sociologicalfragments.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/losurdo-defence_of_modern_day_china-1.pdf
How is that a bad thing? Government has at least some semblance of democratic oversight as opposed to companies that are just tyrannies
looking at OP's update, it seems like this is from the profit-maximizing investor perspective. "I won't buy Chinese stocks because their government regulates them more effectively" is the vibe I'm getting
All my friends make tiananmen square jokes about china. You're lucky
