The source for the Rolling Stone article was trash. But hey it made people on here hoot and holler for the death of rednecks, so the article accomplished it's goal anyway
They got into an argument with someone over people laughing at dying chuds on horsepaste. They tried the whole "it's actually anti-worker to laugh at at chuds" thing. That was 10 days ago. Then they must have gotten into it in that thread for the article. But that thread was removed for misinformation and we already had a debrief thread for it that's still up. So the whole story here is that OP saw some posts they didn't like, got mad, and is now wanting an apology.
Yeah, I was only vaguely aware of the yahoo article being linked here, but hey, still more honest journalistic practice than anything shat out by the Times and co.
That same article has now changed its headline to one that questions the very claim
The source for the Rolling Stone article was trash. But hey it made people on here hoot and holler for the death of rednecks, so the article accomplished it's goal anyway
:jesse-wtf:
They got into an argument with someone over people laughing at dying chuds on horsepaste. They tried the whole "it's actually anti-worker to laugh at at chuds" thing. That was 10 days ago. Then they must have gotten into it in that thread for the article. But that thread was removed for misinformation and we already had a debrief thread for it that's still up. So the whole story here is that OP saw some posts they didn't like, got mad, and is now wanting an apology.
:thonk:
Wrong
:trump-anguish:
:brainworms:
Yeah, I was only vaguely aware of the yahoo article being linked here, but hey, still more honest journalistic practice than anything shat out by the Times and co.