mrbigcheese [he/him] to politics • edit-23 years agobased Illhanexternal-linkmessage-square65 fedilinkarrow-up1134file-text
arrow-up1134external-linkbased Illhanmrbigcheese [he/him] to politics • edit-23 years agomessage-square65 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarecrime [she/her, any]hexbear5·3 years agoChina is still around and thriving largely because of Deng. Changing tactics isn't revisionism, attempting to rewrite history is. link
minus-squarefuckwit [none/use name]hexbear3·3 years ago definitely worth dealing with and not entirely revisionist and crumbling. proceeds to explain how 'changing tactics' ie comprehensive capitalist reform isn't revisionism. All you're doing is using marketing language. link
minus-squarecrime [she/her, any]hexbear8·3 years agoBlaming the Sino-Soviet split on Deng is revisionist. If we're looking at results, China still exists and the communist project there is doing great. Have you checked in on the USSR recently? link
minus-squarefuckwit [none/use name]hexbear6·3 years agoWhat's revisionist is criticising USSR for deStalinization and then proceeding to do the same thing to Mao's policies. China still exists and the communist project there is doing great. A project so dead that Xi is being praised for attempting to revive it. It's going great. link
China is still around and thriving largely because of Deng. Changing tactics isn't revisionism, attempting to rewrite history is.
All you're doing is using marketing language.
Blaming the Sino-Soviet split on Deng is revisionist. If we're looking at results, China still exists and the communist project there is doing great. Have you checked in on the USSR recently?
What's revisionist is criticising USSR for deStalinization and then proceeding to do the same thing to Mao's policies.
A project so dead that Xi is being praised for attempting to revive it. It's going great.