People who disagree with me on every matter should be cast aside as "washed up".
Or, maybe the left should actually stand for at least some principles, instead of tacking on to the latest electoral fad, especially one that bombed Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, etc.
Yes, as a guy who sucks but is still more correct than Chomsky, Zizek, says, "I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong". Beside which, what I hate about Chomsky isn't the position he takes, per se, but his own method of simply, in that droning way of his, repeating "facts" as if facts exist pre-ideologically.
Beside which, what I hate about Chomsky isn’t the position he takes, per se, but his own method of simply, in that droning way of his, repeating “facts” as if facts exist pre-ideologically.
There is no such thing as "facts" or "truths" that exist innocently and "pre-ideologically" because "ideology" is, itself, how the human mind structures and make sense of the world.
You love to see the left primed to prove that they are more radical with instant denouncements and cutting one another down
Or, maybe the left should actually stand for at least some principles, instead of tacking on to the latest electoral fad, especially one that bombed Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, etc.
You disagree with Chomsky on everything? And he's the one that is wrong? Hmm.
Yes, as a guy who sucks but is still more correct than Chomsky, Zizek, says, "I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empirically Wrong". Beside which, what I hate about Chomsky isn't the position he takes, per se, but his own method of simply, in that droning way of his, repeating "facts" as if facts exist pre-ideologically.
lol
Everything Ben Shapiro says can be "factually true" and he can still be completely wrong, because no "fact" or "truth" exist pre-ideologically.
wut
There is no such thing as "facts" or "truths" that exist innocently and "pre-ideologically" because "ideology" is, itself, how the human mind structures and make sense of the world.
lol the last angry post modernist