In Europe (or in particular European countries of your choosing) - on the left-to-right spectrum how would her politics be described?
In Europe (or in particular European countries of your choosing) - on the left-to-right spectrum how would her politics be described?
She’s a socdem. As far as I know she’s never really advocated for socialism as far as I can tell she’s at best in favor of gentler capitalism.
Stop being American for one second and please realize that our understanding of political labels is broken as fuck.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_social_democracy
UK labor is basically socdem sure, but technically fabianism is a form of socialism. Not all socialists are Marxist, please look up the first internationale and it’s detractors
___
I don’t disagree with you but linguistic evolution is a thing. Like libertarian shouldn’t mean ancap but it does now. That’s just my understanding of it and I prefer to keeping the divide for people tolerant of that kind of reformism away from socialism, or the Nordic model or whatever.
Also like I really don’t want to get into the socialist equivalent of arguing what subgenre of metal a band is so I’m just gonna leave it at that lol
See but it isn’t evolving though, we just use doublespeak (language ideology) to shut the Overton window and make moderate stances simultaneously seem more edgy, less pragmatic and more able to coopt radical platforms. We gave up libertarian so now people think subcommandante marcos is against age of consent and we let socialism be too edgy, which allowed shit in France to devolve to the point where the moderates themselves felt like they could get away with a rebranding.
Also this is like thinking screaming and bat biting is all that metal is, when some of it is really fast tempo prog rock
Nobody thinks that lol
Libertarian socialist
Notice how you added socialist instead of just saying libertarian. And besides most people just say anarchist now. Most people who only know libertarian as an ancap aren’t even aware who the subcommandante is
…The zapatistas are not anarchists, you are proving my point.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
M8 another name for libertarian socialism is literally anarchist socialism lol
This conversation is unbelievably boring. I’m not doing this “actually theyre melodeath” stuff. It doesn’t matter my point was socdems and aoc are cringe lol
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ejercito-zapatista-de-liberacion-nacional-a-zapatista-response-to-the-ezln-is-not-anarchist
My understanding was that libertarian socialism was a larger set encompassing anarchism as well as other ideologies such as democratic confederalism
Ive read this before, it’s really good.
This bit is honestly why I find this conversation tedious. I’m not particularly concerned about the etymology of these terms, I just know socdem is, as it’s popularly used now, at the very least useful for drawing a line between people committed to moving away from capitalism and those that aren’t
Also mostly what I was responding to from op was the weird assertion that it’s common that people think libsocs are pedophiles or whatever lol
Anarchist socialism is just as dumb as refusing to admit that social democracy is just a watered down form of pre Marxist socialism.
You right
And you know what fuck it, let’s also admit that communism and anarchism were briefly united before the second internationale.
What even is an ideological schism
Socdems are just a variant of socialism that moderated, socialism existed before Marxism. This is why Cubans say they are communists, not socialists
Socdems are capitalists, you’re maybe thinking of democratic socialists.
I’m thinking of utopian socialists, which was what socdems in Germany started out as before being normalized thanks to the peculiarities of liberalism and kultjrkampf in that country.
I would have consider that demsocs but either way socdems are cringe :shrug-outta-hecks:
No