The spectacle obliterates the boundaries between self and world by flooding the world with images of a self which is its own object. It also obliterates the boundary between seeing and being seen.
The actual next passage in the book is
The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images.
So it's actually rewording the original work. Interesting...
It's also following Debord's style of starting a lot of the theses with "the spectacle is..."
I hate this fucking thing to be honest. It's a gimmick, a very dangerous one. They ask in the EULA to not post the output of the AI to social media, but damn i really want people to witness this.
i know diminishing returns are a thing, but GPT-3 looks like a qualitative leap over GPT-2 and its derivatives. GPT-4 will iterate on the mistakes this makes, and get better. i really wonder what the long term solution is
The actual next passage in the book is
So it's actually rewording the original work. Interesting...
It's also following Debord's style of starting a lot of the theses with "the spectacle is..."
I punched in Heidegger before. It was really fucking something. People will be writing their dissertations this way.
I chose Debord because if he knew we were feeding his words to what is essentially the final form of the spectacle, he'd probably get really upset.
I hate this fucking thing to be honest. It's a gimmick, a very dangerous one. They ask in the EULA to not post the output of the AI to social media, but damn i really want people to witness this.
You absolutely should be sharing this. People need to know the ticks that it has so it's easier to detect.
i know diminishing returns are a thing, but GPT-3 looks like a qualitative leap over GPT-2 and its derivatives. GPT-4 will iterate on the mistakes this makes, and get better. i really wonder what the long term solution is
We'll know soon enough, China just finished one that's 10x as big