Can’t believe this was only a year and a half ago. Cults move fast
This dude is an evil piece of shit. Under no circumstances, as dril would say, do you have to hand it to him, even if he has a point. The dunkable offense is the framing which is deliberate to get engagement and the fact that he’s probably one of those fine arts majors who the Woke CIA hires
Theres a point to be made about the US not teaching kids about atrocities committed against people of color, but saying Anne Frank deserved it probably isnt the best way to go about it
LMAO I remember this. Peak Black Hammer posting. Also, mandatory :wut:
My favourite genre of post is the one where someone doesn't understand that they can be mad at more than one thing
The real Anne Frank was african. Not this whitewashed Becky we've learned about.
It's liberalism sure, but could you in a bar name one example like Ann Frank but for US atrocities?
Dawg I'm gonna have to say :jesse-wtf:
OK now it makes sense with the typo fixed.
She has a museium. The US has done way worse shit, all the time. We don't to many museums about that floating around do we? I think it is valid if he feels invalidated by that.
The US has done some bad shit, including companies helping run the Holocaust, but I think you're reaching. Anne Frank is well known because WW2 was the largest war and the Holocaust the largest genocide (that I'm aware of).
As for victims of the US, obviously they're not going to publicise them much in their media, but that doesn't invalidate Anne Frank.
Side note, do you know who Gazi is? Because he's a certified malicious lunatic and you do not, in fact, have to hand it to him.
I am pretty sure we have done larger genocides. Or at least if you add up the genocides we have done way more for the sport.
He feels nvalidated by it though. I dunno where the correct take in it is but not vibing with US propaganda on his part is valid.
Nah, I don't know who some twitter rando is. This just wasn't some random tweet that got liberals mad?
No, it isn't a random twitter guy. He runs the cult known as Black Hammer, where he abuses the membership and they regularly show up at protests to say incoherent reactionary shit and try to hijack them.
It's wack shit, there was a post about it here a little while ago. They come up with weird takes like this all the time.
Even if he was a random guy, calling Anne Frank a KAREN and a BECKY is just reactionary.
I mean, I could just restate his points but you don't see the spark of an idea there that he comes from a narrative that is worse and less well reguared and he feels bitter about that?
Say it in a sentence. "You feel gaslit and it isn't valid" couldn't be me.
They should call the hypocrisy he's trying to point out through all the twitterbrain the Orwell mentality. The exclusion of Jim Crow, slavery, colonialism, etc from narratives on totalitarianism along with the idea that it's not really fascism until white people are subjected to it. Basically the whole YA novel thing where dystopia is the pit you might fall in without acknowledging dystopia is the pile you're sitting on top of.
