Sputnik 1 was the first artificial Earth satellite. It was launched into an elliptical low Earth orbit by the USSR on 4 October 1957 as part of the Soviet space program. It orbited for three weeks before its batteries died and then orbited silently for two months before it fell back into the atmosphere on 4 January 1958.

It was a polished metal sphere 58 cm (23 in) in diameter with four external radio antennas to broadcast radio pulses. Its radio signal was easily detectable by radio amateurs, and the 65° orbital inclination and duration of its orbit made its flight path cover virtually the entire inhabited Earth.

The satellite's unanticipated success precipitated the American Sputnik crisis and triggered the Space Race, part of the Cold War. The launch was the beginning of a new era of political, military, technological and scientific developments. The word "sputnik" is Russian for satellite when interpreted in an astronomical context; its other meanings are spouse or traveling companion.

Tracking and studying Sputnik 1 from Earth provided scientists with valuable information. The density of the upper atmosphere could be deduced from its drag on the orbit, and the propagation of its radio signals gave data about the ionosphere.

Sputnik 1 was launched during the International Geophysical Year from Site No.1/5, at the 5th Tyuratam range, in Kazakh SSR (now known as the Baikonur Cosmodrome). The satellite travelled at a peak speed of about 8 km/s (18,000 mph), taking 96.20 minutes to complete each orbit. It transmitted on 20.005 and 40.002 MHz, which were monitored by radio operators throughout the world. The signals continued for 21 days until the transmitter batteries ran out on 26 October 1957. Sputnik 1 burned up on 4 January 1958 while reentering Earth's atmosphere, after three months, 1,440 completed orbits of the Earth, and a distance travelled of about 7.0×107 km (4.3×107 mi).

Comprehensive list of resources for those in need of an abortion :feminism:

Resources for Palestine :palestine-heart:

Here are some resourses on Prison Abolition :brick-police:

Foundations of Leninism :USSR:

:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:

Anarchism and Other Essays :ancom:

Remember, sort by new you :LIB:

Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:

THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:

COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:

Come listen to music with your fellow Hexbears in Cy.tube :og-hex-bear:

Queer stuff? Come talk in the Queer version of the megathread ! :sicko-queer:

Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread and Monthly ND Venting Thread :Care-Comrade:

Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:

!labour@hexbear.net :iww:

!emoji@hexbear.net :meow-anarchist: :meow-tankie:

!libre@hexbear.net :libretion:

So a couple of winners for last friday's one. Everyone :rat-salute: comrades @SteamedHamberder, @XiJinpingOfficial, @femboi, and @LeninWeave for getting the answer.

Previous answer

18 x 4.5 = 81

More reasoning with out equations

The product of four consecutive integers is 3,024. What are the integers?

  • None of the four integers is 10. (Or the product would end in 0.)
  • At least one integer is less than 10. (Or the product would have at least five digits.)
  • Then all four integers are less than 10.
  • none of the four integers is 5. (Or the product would end in 5 or 0.)

Complete the solution.

Like usual good luck :soviet-heart: and remember to dm @Wmill the answer.

"Beep... beep... beep... beep..."

  • Sputnik I

I have been listening to Bury the Light on repeat for hours, why is it so good :stalin-stressed:

  • Grownbravy [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    But how am i gonna tell the people i still have to be friends with on facebook tho?

    • layla
      ·
      3 years ago

      You don't have to be friends with them :very-smart:

      If you really do, exchange numbers and talk to them on literally anything else

      • Grownbravy [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        But how am I supposed to make them mad about how much better communism is without actually interacting with them in no other way?

        • layla
          ·
          3 years ago

          You remind yourself that that's not praxis

            • layla
              ·
              3 years ago

              Weird people you consider "friends"

              • Grownbravy [they/them]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Well, they’re facebook “friends” many are just social obligations I had in the past.

                • layla
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  the past

                  • Grownbravy [they/them]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    Yeah, i dont go through my friends list to clean it out, i just stop using it

        • layla
          ·
          3 years ago

          Use Signal or Matrix, both are free and don't send your shit directly to CIA

          • hahafuck [they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Good in theory but I cannot compell dozens of people to make the shift and don't want to balkanize my contacts because I have only a maximum bandwidth for different apps

            Edit: also if the things you are saying are x enough to be of interest to the feds it is insufficient opsec to just say them on a better app

            • layla
              ·
              3 years ago

              Speaking from my experience, yes you can compel dozens of people to make the shift. Assuming they're friends who care about your friendship, they will download a single extra app to keep talking to you, or at least they did for me.

              I'm not going to pretend it was frictionless, and I did lose people when I moved, but honestly I lost no actual friends when I moved.

              • hahafuck [they/them]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Its a smart longterm goal but just not feasible in my case sorry. I could convince the people I regularly talk to 1-on-1, sure, but not the friends-of-friends required to shift the whole friendgroup's series of groupchats. And I like those groupchats. Its just a large undertaking that would require a collective decision or me having to use an extra app and I hate apps

                • layla
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Don't apologise to me, it's your loss :shrug-outta-hecks:

                  I understand the friends of friends thing, in my case I had a few group chats but they were relatively small, and I was good friends with a majority of the people in them. So I convinced like 70% of people to move which meant the whole group chat moved, the others I wasn't as close with moved because everyone else was. But I understand that this isn't an option. e.g. I occasionally get Discord again, because I want to interact with lots of people in relatively big group chats, and I barely know some of the people in them