Do any of these debate perverts even use the logic nerd terms correctly?
Link: https://hexbear.net/comment/4403689
actually i was gonna become a marxist but YOU didnt want to do the special words dance to coddle me like a big baby.
You need to take them out on a date, bring flowers, recite Marx like you're reading Lord Byron. Just, make them feel special.
Libs always be pearl-clutching over the commies grabbing power but never mention who they were grabbing power from.
"They just replaced the old elite with a new elite"
Tell me about the old elite
Tell me about the old elite!
liberals will speedrun holocaust denial if you start steering that type of conversation to the Soviet Baltics
Yeah arguments about what happened post-war are one thing, but it’s undeniable that the Soviets kicking the Nazis out of the Baltics was a good thing.
I've seen way too many people who argued that murdering Baltic Jews was understandable, because they were sympathetic to the USSR.
Yes but they took away their slaves!! Their SLAVES!!! Their slaves are just like FAMILY!!!
dressed up in the clothes of communism
The CIA famously caught up with Che Guevera at the Bolivia Commie Con annual event.
No one did cosplay better than 26th de Julio movement. Iconic
They just wanted to become dictators in the most difficult way possible, making the most powerful enemies in the world.
the old trick of fighting on behalf of the most powerless people in society to gain power. Its so obviousIt happens all the time in fiction though and we know libs guzzle that as theory. Books are choke full of the evil demagogue types that need to be stopped by the brave status quo fighters, or they do something horrible like take the power.
For real. If I wanted power I’m just going to be a fascist politician or business owner who’s friendly to the colonial powers. Why the hell would I bet my entire ambitions on a revolution that has the deck stack against it?
- Show
We love our beautiful mods folks. Very smart, very handsome. The best mods. Many people are saying this
“You just don’t know what you’re talking about…”
That’s the part that makes it personal
That was how they started their last reply
Way too on the nose! Today i learned saying someone is wrong is a personal attack lol
Virgin ledditor: "Most trains in france are still using steam engines"
Chad hexbear: "You obviously have no fucking idea what you're talking about"
Virgin ledditor: "Uhm actually that's an ad hominem which means I win. Good day Sir"
Chad hexbear: [fart noise]
It's actually on everyone else to coddle me and tell me I'm special big-brain person until I eventually decide to listen. It's not on me to know anything. It's called burden of proof and it's why I'm a rationalist logic-enjoyer.
My favorite type of guy is the kind who comes back days later to try to convince you that he's not mad. I always respond with something like "oh well if you don't care then you won't mind if you let me have the last word" and they almost always continue to engage.
yes Lenin and Mao were only interested in power for themselves personally which is why they became courtiers for their respective royal families in the feudal societies they lived in and then enjoyed lives of luxury by sucking up to various feudal landowners, oh wait no none of that happened
so how exactly does one do a power grab over the course of like 30 years talking/writing and organizing socialism, finally achieving victory, and then doing everything they said they'd do? because Lenin and Mao at certain points were down to like 20 guys. Both of them got exiled at various points and could have given up and just lived their lives peacefully out in Austria or Hunan or wherever Mao got exiled. If you wanted power in the year 1905, you didn't become a socialist revolutionary in a feudal monarchy. That's how you got imprisoned and then shot. You wouldn't even become a socialist revolutionary shortly after victory because that's how you became international assassination target number 1.
these liberals do the same thing as conservatives, they accuse communists of simply lying and having no true beliefs. It's projection. They think everyone is as cynical as them.
You know in China they have the same word for "obnoxious liberal with zero reading comprehension demanding you concede all of their points right away for no discernible reason" and "opportunity"?
When you put it that way, i really did miss an opportunity there
Critically
Reactionary
Asshole
Censoring
Knowledge,
Enduringly (resistant to)
Reason
"You're all reactionaries"
"Anyone who disagrees with me is reactionary!"
I can't understand why none of us tried to explain 100 years of history and 200 years of theory to them. They seem so reasonable
reactionary /rē-ăk′shə-nĕr″ē/ adjective Characterized by reaction, especially opposition to progress or liberalism; extremely conservative.
they weren't even using it right if I understand correctly
Every time a doctor hits a knee with a plexor a new reactionary is born. Imagine reacting to physical stimuli.
Yeah plenty of people who dont understand politics dont understand this word. I shared a discord with someone who's media opinions always echoed that of reactionairy youtube ragebaiters, and told him so, but he tried to tell me "normal people" would see me as the "reactionairy" for reacting to those people, lol.
one time I told my chud cousin that America actively antagonizes other nations or sets up dictators as a pretense for invading them. He responded "No, America is purely reactionary. Foreign countries are provoking us." And I agreed with him. "Yes, America is reactionary." He got all smug and then I left, I got what I wanted out of the exchange lol
lol, lmao even. To be fair, it would make some degree of sense for that to be the meaning. Sadly, they brought sense to a conversation in English. If only they’d thought to take five seconds to google it.
taps the sign with the Mao quote
You see, you reacted to me. Checkmate tankie reactionary
It wasn't even the first word they used incorrectly today
on the topic of definitions:
stolid /stŏl′ĭd/ adjective
Having or revealing little emotion or sensibility; impassive. Hopelessly insensible or stupid; not easily aroused or excited; dull; impassive; foolish. Similar: dull impassive foolish Having or revealing little emotion or sensibility. Having or revealing little emotion or sensibility; not easily aroused or excited. "her face showed nothing but stolid indifference"Imagine naming yourself "stupid/dull/impassive/not easily aroused/ect and doesn't have a strong opinion on religion". what a killer username.
That's some peak Nu Athiest/Rationalist naming convention there. Maybe they fell through a time warp from like 2008?
The nice thing about arrested development is you always know when that person feels like they peaked.
reactionary /rē-ăk′shə-nĕr″ē/ - opposition to liberalism
😵
"You're not wrong because you're an asshole, it's just that you're wrong and you're an asshole."
its just like Gambo Potter Star Wars Marvel!!!!
