I'm willing to interpret this 1 of 2 ways until further notice
what you said
that it's embarrassing that the US would even need such a law in the first place, bc US courts/judges are so illegitimate that they would ACTUALLY side in favor of the rapist unless explicitly forbidden via said law.
Oh, yeah, bad take there. You don't get to secretly do things during sex unless it's from a pre agreed upon list of surprises and surprises are considered cool and good by you partner.
This is such a catastrophically bad take that I'm thinking he may have misread the tweet and didn't see the secretly part. Otherwise, wow wtf
I'm willing to interpret this 1 of 2 ways until further notice
but probably 1. Although 2 is definitely true
deleted by creator
What is it a reply to? I don't have an account and it won't let me see.
deleted by creator
Oh, yeah, bad take there. You don't get to secretly do things during sex unless it's from a pre agreed upon list of surprises and surprises are considered cool and good by you partner.