Not sure he understands the level of cringe here.

  • cosecantphi [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is such a catastrophically bad take that I'm thinking he may have misread the tweet and didn't see the secretly part. Otherwise, wow wtf

    • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      I'm willing to interpret this 1 of 2 ways until further notice

      1. what you said
      2. that it's embarrassing that the US would even need such a law in the first place, bc US courts/judges are so illegitimate that they would ACTUALLY side in favor of the rapist unless explicitly forbidden via said law.

      but probably 1. Although 2 is definitely true

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Oh, yeah, bad take there. You don't get to secretly do things during sex unless it's from a pre agreed upon list of surprises and surprises are considered cool and good by you partner.