https://twitter.com/JonahFurman/status/1448483622940446722?t=F-T9_xCRANKmmGJScdNTTg&s=19

      • Quimby [any, any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think I'm ok with it here only because it's hilariously and obviously doomed to fail. Having a computer engineer weld isn't going to work, and thus, won't succeed in breaking the strike. If anything, it reinforces the value of the welders. So yeah, sure, I'll fail to weld something for you. How many things would you like me to not weld today?

        • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          "How many things would you like me to not weld today"

          See, if you fuck up badly enough, you WILL weld it to the point where it can't be sold nor redone correctly. So chin-up comrade. With the right attitude, you can actually do worse than nothing!

          • scraeming [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            "Ah damn my bony keyboard arms have burnt a hole through this axle half an inch out of minimum tolerance, what a shame. Well, practice makes perfect; give me another one!"

            • FreakingSpy [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              I fear not the man who has failed 10,000 welds once, but I fear the man who has failed one weld 10,000 times

              -Bruce Lee

              • scraeming [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                I was thinking of being so bad at welding that I manage to just melt a hole through the base material, which sounds about up my alley. Now that I think about it, I don't even know if a welder would be capable of doing that lmao

                • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]M
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  People definitely cut things with torches, but I don't think that's called welding. I've never seen it in manufacturing, but I suppose it is a good way to permanently take things apart.

            • Washburn [she/her]
              ·
              3 years ago

              On Combine #35 "Oh fuck, this one's the plasma cutter, isn't it?"

          • Quimby [any, any]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            I wish my irl bosses were this inspiring. Do you have any idea how much I'd look forward to work if it meant coming in everyday to fuck around and ruin some corporation?

        • pooh [she/her, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Not only is it doomed to fail, but it's very likely this will tank morale and cause a significant number of those workers to leave permanently, not just go on strike. So the damage to the company will be long term, no matter how the strike itself is resolved.

      • Nakoichi [they/them]M
        ·
        3 years ago

        Technically sure, but the person is already voicing their support for the strike and predicting the effort to break it to fail. They are also signaling to the workers to hold strong because the 'scabs' in this case don't really know what they're doing.

        • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          He's a class traitor, just like when aristocrats become revolutionaries. Big support to him, but he and the other people who are scabbing aren't "workers", their class interest directly contradicts that of the striking workers.

          • baby_trump [undecided]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Babe wake up, it's time for your daily "office workers are not proletarians" take on hexbear!

            • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Oh man, somebody should've told me I own my means of production, I would've refactored it to feed people or help do urban planning or something useful instead of WebShit:tm:

            • effervescent [they/them]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Love when the bourgeoisie are people who make a high salary for their labor. Not defending gross overcompensation of office work but, yea...

          • Nakoichi [they/them]M
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            It isn't though, if anything they are interested in the workers' demands being met, allowing them to go back to the office, they're not getting a bonus for doing a job they aren't even trained for and they're being forced into longer hours under threat of termination.

            The thing is they are actually more replaceable than those factory workers even if (and partly because) they get payed more.

              • ConstipationNation [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                "white collar workers aren't proletarians but also blue collar workers are stupid and lazy"

                fuck off

                  • effervescent [they/them]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    As it turns out, corporations that size have huge hierarchical structures and “manager” isn’t a very useful term because it describes both lowly office drones and multi-millionaire executives. I guarantee the person who wrote this info did not make the decision to adjust their schedule themselves. I’ve been in companies who asked workers to voluntarily sacrifice salary or benefits “for the good of the company” and it doesn’t go well.

              • comi [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                That would make them internal labor aristocracy, still workers though, just with unaligned interests

          • CopsDyingIsGood [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Love to understand salary workers as somehow different from hourly workers even though both earn a wage

      • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        This type of arrangement is incredibly common for industrial companies. No one ever hires scabs, they just force the office people to work these insane shifts to cover. This is part of the reason I hammer home the idea that white collar professionals are not "working class". Workers on the shop floor understand this too - those friendly engineers at your DSA meeting are MANAGEMENT to the hard hats.

        • OhNoSamSeder [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          You're seeing actual management pit two groups of workers against each other and you point at one of them and exclaim "not real workers!"

          Edit

          those friendly engineers at your DSA meeting are MANAGEMENT to the hard hats.

          Frankly, this sounds like something that a chud would say to sow division.

          • effervescent [they/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            This playbook has been run for over 100 years. One of the more blatant examples was racist ass white unions not letting black people join and then going full :shocked-pikachu: when black folks ended up as scabs. The idea that a junior dev is “management” and therefore “not a worker” because they work in an office is straight up Pinkerton propaganda. Literally, union busters will insert people onto the floor to talk shit about the office people and vice-versa.

            • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Do you own the means of production? Or is your income dependent upon showing up and performing a job of some kind? Congratulations, you're a worker. And yes, coordinating people and resources is a job.

              Pay and prestige differences between white collar and blue collar workers are just there to obfuscate their shared class interest. Don't buy into the capitalist's propaganda here.

        • Nakoichi [they/them]M
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          This is part of the reason I hammer home the idea that white collar professionals are not “working class”.

          I disagree re my reply to this same comment. They may be more likely to turn class traitor but they are absolutely still working class.

          • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            They're paid to be scabs. That's literally why John Deere hires engineers to do sbitnwhen they could get someone without a degree to do "plant engineering" or maintenance much cheaper.

            The people that the Labor Notes guy got texts from I guarantee are some 25 year olds who haven't quite figured out what their role is. The older, more experienced PMCs know the score.

          • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            I don't watch TV, this is my life lmfao. 22 year old kids make as much money for a 40 hour work week as people at the very top of the hourly pay scale, in jobs that take 20+ years seniority.

        • pooh [she/her, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          No one ever hires scabs, they just force the office people to work these insane shifts to cover.

          Maybe it depends on the industry or workplace, but this would be unthinkable at every place I've worked at. Throwing untrained salaried workers at tasks they have no experience with is both doomed to fail and will make the problem worse by forcing those workers to start looking elsewhere.

          • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            They aren't "untrained". They don't pull accountants or anything like that to do skilled tasks. They ask engineers who work in maintenance, or do process design or machinery upgrades. People who know how the shit sorta works but don't run it all day long normally.

            • pooh [she/her, any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Process engineers or some others might be able to replicate tasks for processes or equipment they’re familiar with, but there are likely far fewer people in engineering roles who could do that than there are production line workers. Even then, knowing how a process or piece of machinery works certainly isn’t a guarantee that they can perform certain tasks to level of quality or speed of a line worker who’s been doing it for years.

      • OhNoSamSeder [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 years ago

        If you're so incompetent that your mere presence is an obstacle to profit, then yes!

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Slow-walk the work and fuck it up as much as is plausible. Make it more costly than shutting down.

        • Three_Magpies [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          What if this is just a delay tactic? Put some randos in front of the machines, below smoke everywhere and maybe that’s an extra few weeks that the strikers have to strike for. Maybe it’s not meant to succeed, just slow failure as a means of negotiating better.

          • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            I think watching a bunch of useless and unsellable merch thanks to incompetence get produced will only embolden strikes and cost the company more money.

            This is absolutely an, "I'M NOT OWNED, I'M NOT OWNED" moment.

            • Three_Magpies [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              If it’s doomed to failure, this is probably the case. Let’s hope it’s doomed to failure.

      • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]M
        ·
        3 years ago

        Anyone who crosses the line is a scab, and I think we all agree on what we think about scabs. That said, the company is trying to break a strike by putting a bunch of engineers and managers to work on the shop floor and humiliating them. They will only prove how valuable those workers were in the first place.

        These are the brainiacs who decide just because it's theoretically possible you should hold a +/- 0.00005 inch diameter on a gearshaft coated in super-hard chrome and maintain a surface finish between 4 and 8 microinches root mean square. Even tossing the whole labor struggle aside, I'd just love to see them try.