No. This is a ridiculous stretch.
By the same logic you could say the soviets invaded vietnam because they were allied to the french when they did this in 45. But standpoint epistemology is stupid anyways.
Own him for being uninformed and chauvinistic, or that present day germany bans political strikes or how his succdems try to gut the rights of smaller more independent unions and htat he should care about that
Except the soviets didn't support France's invasion nor did it profit from it, and it actively helped Vietnam against France thereafter. the FDR profited from and assisted NATO invading Vietnam and sure as hell didn't help them liberate themselves. Like Cynicalist said, all of NATO is complicit
No. This is a ridiculous stretch. By the same logic you could say the soviets invaded vietnam because they were allied to the french when they did this in 45. But standpoint epistemology is stupid anyways.
Own him for being uninformed and chauvinistic, or that present day germany bans political strikes or how his succdems try to gut the rights of smaller more independent unions and htat he should care about that
not the same kind of alliance tho
NATO: 0
USSR: 1
Except the soviets didn't support France's invasion nor did it profit from it, and it actively helped Vietnam against France thereafter. the FDR profited from and assisted NATO invading Vietnam and sure as hell didn't help them liberate themselves. Like Cynicalist said, all of NATO is complicit