• Healthcare_pls [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Giant meteor comes in and kills both major candidates is not something I expected. Posaidists making the way for the revolution✊

    • Tupamaros [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Goddamnit, I was just about to go to sleep, now I have to jack-off first.

      • emizeko [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Chelyabinsk would have done more damage but the angle of entry was very flat so the atmosphere took the brunt of the energy

        • RNAi [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          But if the angle is too steep didn't they get destroyed faster by the atmosphere? (I am thinking about re-entry angle thing)

          • FinalFantasy_8_Disc2 [none/use name]
            ·
            4 years ago

            I'd imagine it'd be a parabolic relationship between angle and ablation, so 0 degrees and 90 degrees would generate roughly equivalent amounts of ablation while 45 would be the optimal angle for eroding the asteroid.

  • slevin [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Nate Silver had the most accurate odds for the last presidential elections. Things with a 30% chance of happening happen all the time.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Yeah, 30% just means you have to roll a 15 or better on a d20. I think the real error was underestimating his chances in the primary, because he expected the RNC to stop him.

    • quartz [she/her]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I think it's around 0.4% chance of impact. Not too small, considering the number of near earth objects we encounter.

  • RNAi [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    :dolphin: :alien: :hammerandsickle: