Marijuana420 [none/use name] to politics • edit-22 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashlockexternal-linkmessage-square106 fedilinkarrow-up173file-textcross-posted to: chat
arrow-up173external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashlockMarijuana420 [none/use name] to politics • edit-22 years agomessage-square106 Commentsfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: chat
minus-squaregeikei [none/use name]hexbear10·3 years agoconcrete example of what? More proactive stances than their current one ? link
minus-squareRedbolshevik2 [he/him]hexbear6·3 years agoSomething concrete and specific that they could do that wouldn't contradict their non-interference policy. link
Do you have any concrete examples?
concrete example of what? More proactive stances than their current one ?
Something concrete and specific that they could do that wouldn't contradict their non-interference policy.