:corn-man-khrush: He sometimes hit right
Probably why JFK got out of the missile crisis and wanted to cool things off. He wasn't a national security freak who jerked off onto a skull at Yale. My guy was an og himbo.
He wasn’t a national security freak who jerked off onto a skull at Yale
is that what they do at that freakshow lol. I really should've joined a frat in college smh I could've had totally not gay sexual encounters with so many 'straight' dudes lol.
dudes in frats/largely male organizations do some incredibly gay shit to the point where homophobia seems hypocritical
like there's a common thing in hockey/other sports and probably in some frats where everyone literally circle jerks around a cracker or piece of bread and whoever finishes last has to eat it
all the jocks at my school in HS used to go around showing other dudes their dick too, and not even in like a "look at how annoying I'm being, what are you to do about it" way but likely genuinely "YOU NEED TO SEE MY MASSIVE DONG"
like there’s a common thing in hockey/other sports and probably in some frats where everyone literally circle jerks around a cracker or piece of bread and whoever finishes last has to eat it
Yeah heard it referred to as soggy bagel or soggy saltine lol
I cannot imagine any scenario where junior actually studied for an exam or something.
The more I learn about past socialist the more I realize they acts exactly like us
State and Rev is just a very long thread of quote tweets sprinkled with dunks and elaborations.
And Combat Liberalism is Mao trying to tweet but realizing that the technology is still half a century away
Lenin:
writes to the seventh chapter of State and Rev
refuses to elaborate
:troll:
bit: JFK was assassinated because this radicalized him
He didn't want to defend the crimes of the British because it made him look bad, not because he had any genuine aversion to them.
https://www.history.com/news/kennedy-krushchev-vienna-summit-meeting-1961
https://archive.md/VTNq7
Read as a debate on theory I wouldn't call that disappointing-- Kh. displays such a breadth of knowledge and JFK, Harvard grad and successful author of books on contemporary history, just can't keep up.
Of course it isn't a debate, though, and the main point it illustrates is a difference in style. Kh is a politician risen through the committees, and he can built a machine of rhetorics and ideology to support and justify the politics he is pursuing. JFK is a mass media charismatic, and he justifies his policies by attaching his face and a fuzzy label, like freedom.
(And no matter the rhetorics, the material circumstances remain the same: the US deepens its global economic domination, and the world revolution never happens.)
khruschev was just some yokel defending communism, if kennedy tried this with mao kennedy would be sent home in a casket
wait a minute
