My brain doesn't like it and I think it's bad. Please stop.

    • FirstToServe [they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Quick punch what he's saying into the generator. I hope whatever it comes up with is the first 3 google image search results with a swirly background made of their dominant colors.

    • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      :sadness:

      Okay. It literally makes me nauseous. Plus I think it's bad for human brains.

        • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yes, it's hideousness is attractive, but it leaves me with a profound sense of unease.

            • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              ew

              EDIT: I am a fan of the art inherent in the hideous - but the raw unfiltered algorithmic mind, even if imperfect and incomplete, terrifies me - it represents an alienation from the creator unlike anything else.

              • steve5487 [none/use name]
                ·
                3 years ago

                it's not a mind it's a machine that does statistical modelling. It's basically a bunch of art that's been fed to a computer to do some fancy maths. Also the creator in this case is just the programmer

        • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Same here, it's like looking to the mind of a computer being fed our collective consciousness. It's horrific and I can't look away.

        • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          3 years ago

          No it is bad - because I know that there is no soul in the brush strokes and composition - it is a hollow imitation of an algorithm collecting interactions between imaginary spaces.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Hot take: Abstract art always swung between art and masturbation and it's kind of funny that a neural net produces more consistently interesting outcomes than many abstract artists.

            • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              3 years ago

              Yeah, I understand that, but it's a physiological reaction to it - I can start in a section and then be brought out to the whole, and it's terrifying - I can't imagine that pondering those images is healthy.

              • Frank [he/him, he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                That's kind of what I like about it. Whatever you see isn't necessarily what's there, it's your brain grasping to interpret the imagines. It's spicy cognition.

                • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
                  hexagon
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  But you're trying to imagine an algorithmic mind - an alien understanding that you can't fathom.

                  EDIT: You or me or any human being can't fathom it because it's a construct representing all of the direct impulses of human thought.

                  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    I'd argue that your brain is doing what it always does with visual stimuli - Trying to find a recognizable pattern in a field of arbitary input. But in this case the image your brain is trying to find patterns in has, at most, highly distorted partial pieces of recognizable objects, so your brain has to try to tease out meaning from that distorted imagery. It's like a puzzle.

                    • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
                      hexagon
                      ·
                      3 years ago

                      Exactly.

                      But the puzzle is one that has no relation to any human experience.

                      • crime [she/her, any]
                        ·
                        3 years ago

                        But the puzzle is one that has no relation to any human experience.

                        Neither does looking at shapes in clouds or reading tea leaves or anything. It's all random and inanimate.

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]M
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        There's talk about a containment comm, for now I'm directing all AI art posts to either the AI art megathread, the regular mega thread, or the Navy Seal pinned thread.

        Please report any you see out of there and tell the OP where to go.

  • crime [she/her, any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I also wish there was less of it but all your arguments against it sound like satanic panic or other moral handwringing dreamed up by someone who doesn't have even the faintest idea how AI works

  • JuryNullification [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I agree on it being bad. I tried to make fun of it by doing it but I just contributed more to it. Sorry.

    • Tofu_Lewis [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      It's fascinating, but it does something to my brain when I look at it. I think it's bad for you.

  • Vncredleader
    ·
    3 years ago

    THANK YOU.

    Pls I get that people are having fun and some of these are neat, but keep it to a megathread or something. It feels like every 5th post the past couple of days

  • AndyCapps [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Begging for relief from your own aesthetic preferences is fuckin soft as hell.

    Having said that, the "art" sucks. You're playing with an incredibly advanced spirograph. It looks like the thing you typed but all screwey. I don't get the appeal at all.

  • CopsDyingIsGood [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Seeing this post made me realize it's not gonna stop for a while and so I'm better off unsubscribed from c/art for a while so thank you for making this post

  • Kanna [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I've pretty much avoided it at this point, is it really that bad? now I'm curious