The ‘walking route’: How an underground industry is helping migrants flee China for the US
TL:DR a bunch of western brainwormed Chinese citizens choose to expatriate into the U.S by taking treacherous routes through Latin America.
San Diego, California
They come with backpacks carrying a few spare changes of clothes and whatever money and phones they weren’t robbed of by criminals or cartels along the way, arriving at the United States-Mexico border exhausted from the stress of the journey north.
Like the hundreds of thousands of people around them who have also trekked weeks to reach the US, they’re driven by a desperation to escape and make a new life, despite the uncertainty of what’s on the other side.
But these migrants are fleeing the world’s second largest economy and an emerging superpower.
On a recent winter day, dozens of Chinese nationals waited in different makeshift camps scattered outside San Diego, California, just north of the Mexican border.
It gets a little funnier in a bit
Bundled in hoodies and jackets, they huddled around fires as they, and others there, counted the time before US border control agents would take them away for processing – and what they hoped would be the start to their lives in America.
These arrivals are part of a staggering new trend. In the first 11 months of 2023, more than 31,000 Chinese citizens were picked up by law enforcement crossing illegally into the US from Mexico, government data shows – compared with an average of roughly 1,500 per year over the preceding decade.
This whole propaganda article is only about a few thousand people while making it seem like it's millions. Talk about making mountains out of ant hills
Their numbers are still dwarfed by those from regional neighbors like Mexico, Venezuela, and Guatemala, and they are not alone in coming from other parts of the world. But the influx of people from China making that crossing spotlights the urgency many now feel to leave their native country, even in the midst of what leader Xi Jinping has claimed is a “national rejuvenation.”
As China squeaks ever so slightly closer towards socialism, more yankee-brained liberals, small business tyrants, religious cranks and few desperate disillusioned youths that think the grass is greener on the other side will flee to America and other western states.
Many who left point to a struggle to survive.
Three years of Covid-19 lockdowns and restrictions left people across China out of work – and disillusioned with the ruling Communist Party’s increasingly tight grip on all aspects of life under Xi. Now, hope that business would fully rebound once restrictions ended a year ago has vanished, with China’s once envious economic growth stuttering.
Blah blah blah China's gonna collapse any day now
Others nod to restrictions on personal life in China, where Xi has overseen a sweeping crackdown on free speech, civil society and religion in the country of 1.4 billion.
<insert jab at America here>
“We are Christians,” one neatly dressed middle-aged man said simply when asked what had led him there – a bare encampment thousands of miles from home.
I wonder what kind 
These Chinese nationals join migrants from around the world whose numbers have overwhelmed the southwestern US border with illegal crossings in recent months. Most are seeking asylum after they cross – a pathway that may narrow in the coming weeks as Congress is expected to move to stem that flow amid a fierce debate over immigration.
As if it already wasn't narrow as is.
For now, people from China are on track to be the fastest growing group making those crossings, according to a CNN analysis of the latest law enforcement data on border encounters.
Give it a few months and we'll see the talking heads moan about the Argentinan migrant crisis
And as the numbers making their escape have grown, so too has a network of businesses and social media accounts catering to Chinese migrants, who must often take a circuitous route across continents, before beginning the arduous, overland journey north.
The gateway
For many, that overland route begins in Quito, Ecuador – a city of roughly 2.5 million high in the Andean foothills that has become a gateway for those escaping China.
Lots of dangerous land to travel between Ecuador and southern U.S territories.
In 2022, Ecuador documented around 13,000 Chinese nationals entering. In the first 11 months of 2023, that number rose to more than 45,000. The country doesn’t require visas for Chinese passport holders
A cottage industry of businesses caters to the border-bound, starting with airport pickups to arranging stays at Chinese-run hostels and organizing the journey north – often for a hefty fee, CNN reporting has found.
Grifter networks abound
Evidence of the growing trend appears across Quito, if one knows where to look.
At one bus station, a ticket agent has a sign for “the Colombian border” printed in Chinese, ready to flash to potential customers. At a local hospital offering vaccinations – recommended for a treacherous jungle crossing – the Spanish-speaking nurse keeps a Chinese translation of the intake form on her desk.
Hella sketch. I'd fly back to China at this point.
Along the fringes of the city’s central business district are a growing number of businesses linked to the trend, travel agent Long Quanwei, who immigrated to Quito from China five years ago, told CNN last month.
At one of these hostels, where a night’s stay with meals costs about $20, printed Chinese-language maps and instructions pasted to a wall detail each leg of the trip. The owner, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of online backlash, estimates there are 100 such small businesses like hers that cater to Chinese travelers, including those preparing to head north.
“Many people come here and don’t speak English or Spanish, so they look for me,” she said.
You can read the rest if you're bored. It goes on about one of the more sympathetic stories of a rural worker who's had a real rough run of it in China and hates being exploited by his corporate overlords but thinks his life in America will be better. I don't think so, but best of luck dude. After that it's more propaganda bullshit. Save your braincells.
The scale of illegal border crossings is exaggerated, as are the conditions in China. It isn't worth pointing out individual instances, because basically every line of the article is doing one or the other. If it doesn't seem like that to you then with all due respect, you need to read the news more critically.
It’s exaggerated? They give direct numbers in the article. Who’s exaggerating?
I’m reading pretty critically here.
It seems the guy saying “I can’t give specifics but you should get the general idea” is the one with not much substance to share.
I am not writing a point by point dissection of that article just to ease your confusion.
I will only say that good propaganda is not lies, but information that cannot be disproven, presented in such a way as to give credence to a desired narrative.
It’s propaganda because it provides an honest account of what’s happening?
Or it’s propaganda because you don’t think it deserves to be reported on at all?
Honestly those are the only two scenarios I can glean out of your vague in-language laden replies.
Ok, now I'm sure you're full of shit.
Here, this link will explain everything you need to know.
Removed by mod
Ah I see what's causing your confusion. No, I don't want to debate you. I only answered you at all because I thought you might actually be confused, and not be using mock ignorance as a lazy, duplicitous rhetorical tactic.
If you don't understand any of my "in-lingo" feel free to look it up in any english dictionary, I assure you they're regular words that mean the usual things. I see you do know what "narrative" means though so I assume you're also lying about not understanding my point about propaganda.
You don’t want to debate what? I’m not asking for a debate, I’m asking why you disagree with a story that’s pretty straight forward. If you don’t like that this is being highlighted you can just say “I don’t think this is a story that needs to be told” and that’s it. But you keep dancing around why you don’t agree with the story, because…?
I don’t get it man. Here’s a chance to educate someone asking genuine questions about your biases and all of your backs are up because you don’t like anybody asking “why” I guess. Really fucking sad to see.
Don't put words in my mouth, clown.
I've explained pretty clearly. The way information is presented supports certain politics.
I question my biases all the time, I don't see you questioning yours that "MSM = objective" and all that crap. Go home
All people are saying is while the facts may be there they're being misleading about the importance of the story, and it's to propagate negative views about China. It's calling for people to look at and care about the minute fraction of extreme Chinese who want to leave for a life that we know will be worse. Meanwhile more than 90% of people in China are happy with their government, and the capitalist press never remarks that fact.
What is misleading about the importance of the story? It’s happening. The article doesn’t draw any conclusions about what the ramifications are.
Anything being blown out of proportion is happening in your minds, as far as I can tell. The article is basically saying “hey this happens, here’s the numbers” and you’re all acting like that’s a bad-faith argument because… I don’t know why. It’s a weird groupthink thing that I guess I just don’t get.
There’s nothing misleading or incorrect about the reporting here. If you don’t agree with what the author is saying, what data do you have to refute it?
Reference Orwell again and you will permanently cement your place in hell
Is it propagating a negative view of China or is it reporting something that most Americans don’t realize is happening? There’s no negative bias in the reporting that I can see. It’s a pretty straightforward account with numbers to back it up. Do you think Americans shouldn’t see information like this?
The article ignores the material causes of mass “illegal” immigration to the US (Western imperialism), instead writing about this case when:
So why is this done? For anti-China propaganda to satiate jingoist crackers.
The article repeats the Xinjiang abuse myth uncritically and dishonestly by simply saying they were unfairly treating “Muslim minorities” (when there are larger Muslim minority groups in China), but this is merely done to tie it into the “religious repression” narrative. So no mention of US support for fundamentalist terrorism/ETIM of course [1] [2] [3]. You could say they technically just referenced the UN report, but to do this in such a clearly biased/incorrect way is wrong.
And furthermore the article misconstrues the anti-corruption purges as a “sweeping crackdown on civil society”, where (gasp) not just the corrupt are targeted but also the corrupt (but because some were Xi’s “opponents” they can’t be corrupt).
The article cited for the “crackdown on… religion” cites the Freedom House (described as a “US-based NGO”, despite most of their funding coming from the US State Department). Next they cite ChinaAid, which received the NED (CIA) “Freedom Award”, and whose staff is 90% former/current US government employees. Then they repeat the Xinjiang genocide nonsense again.
Yes