There is nothing more sexually aggressive than the middle name RODHAM. It simply discharges ferocity.
She even boasted on the news that she would have bombed Syria earlier than Trump did.
Remember that instead of arguing with electoralists (plenty of liberals do this already because they’re laser-focused on never doing anything good or winning), you can prepare real world, decentralized-autonomous Red Guard collectives and begin undertaking guerrilla war operations against their ability to conduct elections in the imperial core!
Instead of voting, see how many other people you can convince to not vote. See how many of them also hate fake liberal politicians and already know that voting won’t change the system and radical action is necessary. How many liberals are going to have to admit that this isn’t a real election when nobody can vote, and there’s cops and fascist militias outside the polls in street battles with radical anarchists and communists? The system can be toppled.
Organize and agitate the people, start riots outside the polls, fight the police, completely throw the election, subvert and undermine any bourgeois legitimacy that the neoliberal system is trying to manufacture for itself.
Shining Path is also good and very scary for the bourgeoisie
you edited the comment to call the masses “apolitical lumpen” - I disagree and feel that’s a counter-revolutionary sentiment with fashy vibes
who are the lumpen? Tell me which comrades you think are lumpen
No we just consider you “legal communists” to be fascist compradors, and reality seems to confirm that - you really think the fucking Red Guards tolerate fascism?
Who are the lumpen, nazbol? Who is the splitter?
You’re clearly more interested in fighting communists and hating the poor (voting for the third position like a real nazbol) - maybe you’re the fascist?
As a woman, I have no idea what she's talking about. I don't relate to lizards. That's not a thing all women do.
Constantly surprised that thinking both "yeah it would be cool to finally have a female president" AND "but obviously Hillary Clinton would make a terrible president and I would prefer to never hear anything from anyone in her family ever again" is apparently a complex and nuanced stance to have?
