I hope white anarchists/leftist never get so see their vision come...
old.reddit.com
I really mean this, how black and Indigenous radicals are treated in these spaces shows me what the world white anarchists want to build looks...

ironically the top thing on their sub right now is: "Accomplices Not Allies | Abolishing the Ally Industrial Complex; An Indigenous perspective & provocation" :michael-laugh:

OP:

"I hope white anarchists/leftist never get so see their vision come true, because that vision is hell for us Black and Indigenous anarchists"

I really mean this, how black and Indigenous radicals are treated in these spaces shows me what the world white anarchists want to build looks like. We've seen examples already with CHAZ were two black teens were killed, and whites tried saying they were robbing or fascists or something, not owning up to what they did. No I see no revolutionary potential among white people, y'all can be mad if you want I won't explain any further. Y'all gotta take a deep look at yallselves and fucking change. 5 points (52% upvoted)

Where's the cOmMuNiTy MuTuAl AiD for the black teen they paralyzed? Say their name! :amber-snacking:

comment section:

Support intersectionality. Get your woke segregationist bullshit out of here.

lmao literally just /r/stupidpol idealists with the exact same thought-terminating cliches, but pro-intersectionality? There's a reason why these labor aristocrats on Breadtube/WSWS/etc never tweet the word "segregation" unless they're hating on black teens for being "woke", or soyfacing at Bernie getting arrested 60 years ago: They are radlibs who cannot reckon with the material conditions of the Actually Existing Segregationist apartheid that allows them to not have real jobs ("nooo that's evil Stalinism to force me to stop being a furry zine artist!!! My youtube channel/Trot newsletter is doing revolutionary praxis by scolding the blacks for not being patriotic settler vampires like me")

Yea, but building communities and boundaries based on race, seems to be a nazi sweet dream.

Your equation of white = oppressor is the same type of thought as a typical local nationalist's roma=robber, stealer, thief, lowlife. Turning the pyramid on its head its not ending opression. Forgetting and forging new ways of life is whats going to end opression. Lots of Nations and Nationalistic hate is build on "memory", don't reproduce the same mistakes.

Imagine whining about "memory"...what's the opposite of historical materialism? This willfull smoothbrain ideology is it

So my point here is that our identities, our histories, our heritage are experiences during opressive hierchies. If we believe of planet without borders, of people freely deciding their lives, we should first stop being slaves to our roots.

white people who can't say the word segregation unless they're mocking "woke segregationist" black teens (who they reflexively shoot to defend their white settler communities) think they're "slaves" to the memory of their nazism. It's vitally important for them to forget the past so they can do open borders undocumented slave apartheid without any friction to their utopian dreams :maybe-later-kiddo:

  • effervescent [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is the first BMF post I've fully understood and agreed with

    When a trans person is exploring their gender expression and a TERF accuses them of hypocrisy for not working to "abolish gender", we correctly identify that as thinly veiled transphobia. Gender abolition is not simply an immediate transition to a lack of any gender markers. But when a bunch of white "revolutionaries" get called out for recreating the systems of oppression they claim to want to abolish, and they hide behind "race abolition", why is it less clear what's happening?

      • effervescent [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        BlackMoldFutures, an old alt of OP that usually posts leftist word salad, but in this case seems to have a point

        • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Bmf is almost always coherent but uses weird specific terminology, that if you are not incredibly online will seem like gibberish. Not saying I always agree with their takes, but the take itself is usually coherent... Now what it is always directed at or what causes the post, I can't usually figure that out, but with this one its pretty clear.

        • zeal0telite [he/him,they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Maybe I'm insane but I could always understand BMF posts. Like they're not incoherent, it's just a huge drop of terminology that not everyone is familiar with.