This is a truly incredible article that criticizes China's plans to build high speed rail to under-served parts of China by taking the angle that it won't make money, and therefore is stupid. Amazing that infrastructure projects that help rural Chinese gain access to a high speed rail network is criticized from the angle of profit-making when making a profit is never the point with infrastructure projects. The NYC subway system wasn't built to "make a profit," but that doesn't mean it was a bad idea. But China bad so somehow them building a crazy amount of high speed rail is bad.
They're building high speed rail into Xinjiang which has like 1000km of wilderness desert and mountain ranges (all of which is deeply environmentally destructive to build through in the short term) followed by a few smaller cities which will now be connected. These things are measured by passenger miles, but the populations of these areas already just make it obvious that this has no real transportation value.
The only comparable context in US terms would be if we built high speed rail to connect parts of alaska to Washington.
deleted by creator
Except in Xinjiang there are like 4 cities around the size of 500k and that's it. And then there's like 1000km of wilderness and small towns before you have other similarly sized cities.
well i know of the top of my dome xinjiang has at least like 25x the population of alaska, but my question was what the breakevenpoint is, asy ou would need it based on the claim youve made and I'd like to better understand the situation
and theres not the second biggest country in the world in between xinjiang and the rest of china lol