Do you think he should’ve just drawn on the kid rather than try to dive on him? Seems in the state the shooter was in he would’ve shot him if he had pulled his weapon, not surrendered. Should he have just shot him while he was down? What was tactically the best option? And legally?
I’m not sure whether it’s a weakness or a strength that for someone on the left, the non-lethal option was what he went for. You just know any CHUD would’ve shot first asked questions later, as proven by the fash baby.
Shooting another person, no matter what they just did, may not click automatically. Just because you carry for self-defense doesn't mean you're prepared to kill at any time, I feel.
I think the adrenaline had him leaning towards defense after the fact, if he did draw afterwards. "He shot someone and me, he's still shooting, he needs to be stopped by whatever I can muster."