• DragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    You're literally the only one who brought up her trans-ness out of nowhere as an attack and insinuates that this site didn't shit on her harder because we're pro trans and thus have to defend her because of that.

    How stupid do you think we are? Do you seriously think we're unfamiliar with this tactic?

    Just fuckoff to whatever shitty sub:reddit-logo: or discord you hangs out and tell us you owned us idpol sjws epic style.

    • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I didn’t use her trans-ness as an attack against her. I clearly criticized her for tactical errors, sectarianism and general failure at being a spokesperson.

      • DragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Then why this:

        I swear you all are going to circle the wagons here and defend a sex pest sectarian blunder just because she is trans. Keep walking into these blunders, it’s clear you don’t really ever want to win if you defend this

        And this

        The more you circle the wagons and defend, the more closely they will be tied to being representative of the trans community

        If you had just stopped at the dog walker part your argument would be viewed more in good faith and instead of this bullshit we would have a more productive discussion about what constitutes as "labor".

        But instead you brought up transgenderism as something of a liability. That it "blinds" us from seeing the truth and engages in identity politic. This is a very typical tactic, social justice is bad because it distracts people from class struggle or something.

        Again, just go ahead and take your screenshots and post it in stupidpol spaces. Have a laugh with all the reactionaries you welcome there. If you're not the one doing it then somebody else will so might as well claim your fake internet points.

        • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
          ·
          3 years ago

          It’s not a liability and none of my critiques of Doreen were due to her gender or trans status. They were valid critiques of tactical failure.

          My point is that on this site, trans-ness is not a liability - in fact it acts as an impenetrable shield that will get people to start telling communists to go to the wall over completely legitimate criticisms. It causes you to act irrationally and defend and indefensible person and situation when you should be dunking instead

          • DragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            If you've been here for longer than a month then you'll know that site have been criticizing r/antiwork long before this thing blew up. We have been denouncing it for various reason: that it's a liberal relief valve, that it took away energy from actual leftism, that it's just PMC capital strike.

            The one group we always shut downs in this site with no exception are critics of AES states. Whatever people think about it, this site is unwaveringly pro-China, Cuba, DPRK, etc. Is that what you're complaining about? That we defend DPRK?

                • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  There is no victim hood, I’m making a critique about the ways in which this site acts in irrational ways on this subject due to overreaction

                  Like you’ve managed to put yourself on the side as a Vaush-tier rapist and national embarrassment, calling for the death of communist members of this site. That doesn’t strike you at all as odd?

            • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
              ·
              3 years ago

              It’s true on this site, not out in the world. As long as a user claims to be trans they are able to bludgeon and threaten others into irrational anti-materialist positions