hyper paradisiac communism : which is a democracy of rights with collectivist values and very small command economy to make sure everything is okay physically and mentally for everyone

or

free market collectivism : which is a democratic movement that hypes the free market with collectivist values (you do wathever you want democratically as long as you are a collectivist)

  • VeganVelveeta [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    idk probably the same shit I do now, but with less suffering.

    Work, help build shit, hang with friends, get wine drunk off cheap rosé, volunteer in my neighborhood, etc

    I don’t mind labour if what I’m doing is socially beneficial, I just want to not be starving to death and impoverished.

    • sorryamlate [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don't like systems that impoverish people, because in my dream state you would see the power of the internet an hyper paradisiac communist technology save people from starvation , also you could vote on the decisions of the communist government so that everyone is happy with the economic decision voted by the people's hyper paradisiac party that takes your power to vote and have rights and gives you the opportunity to vote all the time and decide the collectivist party that own your country for 5 years and the population decides almost every decision in the country that is : where do we put the bridge (A or B), library or hockey center, where is the loomball project gona take place, etc. politiciant will have polyvalent abilities with communist requirement + the collectivist ideas of you choice you want to do during your term.

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        All forms of communist society will emerge and develop through historically specific determinate processes. Attempting to predict and predetermine the structure and constitution of such organizations is a sign of utopian socialism, naive at best and reactionary at worst. While speculating on proper government and state procedures can be useful in small amounts, such practices should be limited to actual interparty discussions.

        That being said, it's difficult to say if talking about tweets is anymore useful. But at least tweets are real things that people are doing and saying.

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Thanks, but it's just a fancy way of saying that you can't really predict the future that far out, so it is of little use to seriously discuss it. A better use of time is to study currently existing political dynamics and forces and attempt to understand how those interact. Still an incredibly challenging task, but at least somewhat relating to the real.

          • TreadOnMe [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Fair, but again, outside proper contexts, it is naive. Applied political processes , developments and definitions are, unfortunately, emergent phenomena.