I think that the smaller and mid-level bougies are going to pivot their manufacturing out of the PRC and toward Mexico in the coming years for a handful of reasons (which should be obvious?)

Without a sizeable exploitable labor force facilitated by the PRC I guess it's the logical option since you have proximity, NAFTA, and plenty of poverty working in your direction.

I heard one of these bougies talk about how a partner company is "onshoring" their manufacturing from China to Mexico and it skeeved me out with the vague implication that China was opportunistically exploited labor, but Mexico is rightfully exploitable by American capital. I guess I shouldn't expect them to see the term "offshore" as referring to anything other than the literal ocean, since they have no conception of economic exploitation.

  • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
    ·
    2 years ago

    NAFTA already pulverised Mexico. if firms shift to Mexico its literally just because Chinese labor prices went up (compounded with shipping costs/difficulty) and Mexico's haven't.

    the "Drug War" features alot of government-cartel collaboration. both are broadly anti-left, i don't think more US capital would change this. The people Coke had suppress the union in Colombia for example were traffickers

    • gaycomputeruser [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah mexico has already been very fucked by us trade. It would just be that but worse.

    • spectre [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean sure, but it's impossible to do without a communist background and sharing a land border with the imperialist power.

  • spectre [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bonus question: If the US starts to go even harder on exploiting Mexico, is there a chance that there is enough incentive to clean up the drug war? Not to necessarily go for a "silver lining" play, but I figure the piggies will get tired of their shipments getting stolen. Also possible that the cartels leave them alone in order to be left alone idk

    • Rojo27 [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Maybe. On the other hand I'm not sure how much of an inconvenience the cartels really are for monied interests.

      Considering the long history of organized crime being used to blunt workers' movement I would think leaving the cartels alone would be convenient once workers movements inevitably spring up to combat exploitation.

      • karl3422 [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        probably the cartels would be prevented from shaking down any US business but allowed to do whatever they want to locals. Pretty much the same deal the mob got under Batista

    • bananon [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      The cartels will go on the American dime like the mafias in Cuba

      • rebrone [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Didn't the United States only go after the mafia after they got involved with labor unions?

    • rebrone [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I would like to see a world where the drugs come from America and the guns come from Mexico, reverse that shit like the Chicago river.

  • comi [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think looking at vanguard of shit (apple) they are moving to india and vietnam :shrug-outta-hecks:

    Mexico will prolly gain the giant warehouses tho, they seem to get them already

  • pppp1000 [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I know someone in the manufacturing industry and they said the current supply chain issues makes manufacturing some items cheaper in the US compared to Mexico.