Background about the rugpull: https://web3isgoinggreat.com/?id=2022-02-11-3
edit: I can't find their specific Christmas Lana, but this is the one she linked in her minting announcement: (sfw-ish, bad cartoon in lingerie) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FHepskOWUAEf6Fi?format=jpg&name=large
So let me try to understand this
Someone bought "exclusive" rights to a picture of a cartoon version of a porn star for 4000$. Why did they think they'd make money of this? Is this the dumbest shit ever envisioned? Did I miss something? What?
ugh. Normies.
Someone INVESTED in an OPPORTUNITY to GET RICH FASTER THAN YOU CAN by buying one of 6069 cartoon versions of a porn star for $4000 (https://opensea.io/collection/officialcryptosis?search[sortAscending]=true&search[sortBy]=PRICE). When the Crypto Sis roadmap is complete (https://www.cryptosisnft.io/#roadmap), they'll receive exclusive benefits. A business education from unnamed rich people, free advertisement on the Lana Rhoades social media accounts, mainstream females building a bigger movement than you can imagine, and one lucky owner will get the chance to meet a real white South African.
Didnt fully commit to the bit :stonks-down:
Cue Milo from Trashfuture doing the Jerk Van Der Klerk bit
Somehow it's maybe worse. I misspelled Cecil Rhodes' name in my head and went looking to see if they were related. That's only her stage name, her actual surname being Maple which is decidedly un-Afrikaaner and her hometown being Chicago which is a different apartheid state. So that means she specifically changed her name to Rhoades and then moved to South Africa for some reason.
No, the NFT doesn't grant any rights