"nooo the nuclear family is normal! If you feel empty and alienated in the suburbs, that's what it feels like to have freedom!" ok groomer
Nuclear families are not natural. Humans are a communal species by nature. The saying is "It takes a village" for a reason.
I agree with you, but I don’t believe humans have any “Natural” way to organize family groups.
We’re adaptable to almost anything, and tried all types of grouping.
Nuclear Family can be much more diverse than what we see currently. For example Communal, and Nuclear can freely switch between each other.
They usually do. I can’t think anyone I know that has a literal nuclear family.
Even the name nuclear family is manufactured. People don’t actually fit in neat boxes like that.
2.5/10 on the :jesse-wtf: scale. Disappointed after an excellent showing on the urinal fly post. Is BMF losing their touch?
3/10 on the :jesse-wtf: scale.
Needs more :peter-coffin:
When you have 2.4 kids, is the decimal point just a pair of legs wandering around?
Aren't they the fucks that support child brides? Aren't they the fucks that do honor killings?
All it took was some pepes and they socially engineered being a soccer mom to be a cool thing.
Remember: grooming is whatever parents don’t agree with. If anyone tells my kids about eating animals or cars that’s actually grooming.
Yes, where do you think Nazis got the inspiration from back in the day? I'll give you one big hint, the land of the murder of innocents and Coca Cola.
Being gay doesn't make you sterile. Children exist outside of nuclear families.
No, but getting rid of straight families would probably end the species since there is no longer any inherent incentive to reproduce.
No one is saying to get rid of straight families? That's not what we mean when we criticize the nuclear family, or did someone saying "it takes a village" upthread not make that clear?
And many gay people have and want children too. It's real funny the way that you think we have to have this specific family structure, and only this structure, or people won't have any "inherent incentive to reproduce", as if humanity would have even lasted this long if that was true. The nuclear family is a really recent thing
All I’m saying is that someone being homophobic isn’t an excuse to start being heterophobic.
Who is being heterophobic? No one even brought up straight people before you did.
What even led you to this website, 1 month old account that only started posting a day ago about stupid wrecker shit?
When Reddit quarantined Russia I wanted to go somewhere that wasn’t flooded with propaganda. I love this site but you guys have a few blind spots yourselves.
Lol you're still conflating "the nuclear family" with "straight people" and you say WE have blind spots?
Wait why am I even engaging with you seriously? Fuck off wrecker
I’ve been quite civil. You just keep getting your panties twisted because someone sees the world differently.
That’s fine if you don’t want a nuclear family. But it’s rude to criticize people who might.
Just like it would be rude of me to criticize a homosexual family structure.
I have no idea what “wrecker” means.
I assume you mean I’m wrecking your discourse by disagreeing. I didn’t realize this was a circle jerk.
You’re right it was rude to question your competence. But when you say you can’t be racist against “insert race here” that’s a pretty good indication you’re racist
The point of the title is that sexuality has always been forced on children, but because heterosexuality is the default in American culture it's been heterosexuality forced on children. Now the chuds are all up in arms because of pro-LGBT teachers, acting like kids are being forced to be gay, when kids have always been forced into heterosexuality.
Lol It’s literally the exact same behavior as homophobia.
Just because one is more popular doesn’t mean it counterpart doesn’t exist.
And heterphobia isn’t?!
You’re delusional if you think the LGBT community isn’t backed up by power.
How about an example of gay people criticizing straight people for choosing their family structure? Oh wait that’s this thread.
I get that it was in response to a hateful person. But acting like a hateful person is the exact opposite way to say their behavior is wrong.
Being critical of ideas isn’t hateful. Unless those ideas are tied to orientation.
For example, the idea that LGBT people are groomers isn’t being critical. It is hateful.
This is a fair argument but I think the line between criticizing behavior only one orientation partakes in and bigotry is incredibly fine and also leads to abuse.
I’m not mad. I’m just pointing out the above fact. I’m only continuing to comment because my inbox exploded with aggression.
Individual people saying shit you don’t like is not the same as actual system violence that is homophobia
Straight people have never lost jobs, been attack or killed, or otherwise ostracized by the whole of spciety and told their lifestyle is wrong. There is no possible way to make your claim on this make sense in the real world it is completely delusional
The only thing you can do is hold up a straight person getting some shit for being a bigoted asshole as “oppression” which it isn’t
I never said I didn’t like it. I just think that partaking in the same behavior you criticize is cringe. I’m always going to point out hypocrisy.
Extremely embarrassing you can’t recognize how incongruent these two things are lmfao I hope you’re like 15
Really? All I hear from you is a bunch of assumptions.
Deductions.
Realists see a fact and then follow it to it’s logical conclusion to find the most likely outcome.
Fighting bigotry with bigotry is destructive. And whether you recognize it as bigotry or not, other people do. So kindly follow the golden rule and don’t behave like bigots. Even sarcastically.
Realists see a fact and then follow it to it’s logical conclusion to find the most likely outcome.
Lord give me the unearned confidence of a straight white guy who thinks his gut feelings about things is science
Didn’t realize philosophy was science but okay.
Didn’t take long for you to show your true colors.
Realists see a fact and then follow it to it’s logical conclusion to find the most likely outcome.
:very-intelligent:
Imagine calling yourself a realist and being so bad at basic observation lmfao
Yeah I'm a realist.
REALly bad and figuring out what's going on :big-cool:
And suddenly all your responses make sense. You’re mentally challenged.
Why would you assume that's the alternative?
Straight people still exist and having a community help raise a child is how humans are supposed to be.
I assumed since they didn’t like straight culture that they didn’t like straight people either. Kind of hard to separate the two.
You seriously think gays want to ban straight people?
Lol
You're so close... now think: what was the context of that comparison?
No, nerd. It was to highlight how ridiculous calling lgbt 'child grooming' is
My bad. I got confused when they legitimately started criticizing nuclear families.
Weird that humans existed for hundreds of thousands of years without a nuclear family without going extinct
Every single living organism on this planet right now: :yes-hahaha-yes-l:
