• SadStruggle92 [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now perhaps there was an existing, educated and empowered political class of workers that was sufficient to reconciling the conflict in their favor? That’s what would have been required.

    Here's a question for that though: How in the hell did The Soviet Union of all places lack, or lose such a thing?

    • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      For about the same reason Western labour movement in 80s was unable to do anything - they thought they already won and became complacent.

    • kristina [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Here’s a question for that though: How in the hell did The Soviet Union of all places lack, or lose such a thing?

      Long term rot. I really like Xi Xinping's take on this in the Governance of China, Khrushev's repudiation of Stalin and a focus on the party's failures instead of a focusing on how the party learned and rectified inevitable mistakes caused an ideological rot. In contrast, Xi says Deng's reforms did not throw the rest of the party under the bus, and instead strengthened it.

      I feel like this is pretty applicable to what happened in Czechoslovakia too. People were quick to blame Stalin for all the country's woes. However, without Stalin and the Red Army our culture wouldn't even exist anymore. So by giving credence to the idea that Stalin was the problem, you also give an opening for people saying 'ah the Nazis weren't that bad' or 'maybe the West isn't wrong' by default which is why you have such a worship of fascist leaders in many post-Soviet states.