• JudgeJuche [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    But a 19 year old who gets circumcised because of a skin condition doesn’t now have a mutilated penis

    In the United States, all foreskin problems are treated with amputation simply because physicians aren't taught anything else. In Europe, phimosis is treated by other, less radical methods, and circumcision is practically never necessary. Thus, treating phimosis with circumcision is still mutilation, just as amputating your arm to treat a bruise would be mutilation (although I agree that circumcising a healthy boy is more egregious).

    I read a story of a man in France who elected for circumcision to treat his phimosis. When he later learned that other treatments were available, he was so dismayed that he sued his physician for not properly informing him of his medical options, and he sued his doctor and won.

    • Provastian_Jackson [he/him]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      I was going to write a smart response but then I realized I was just trying to explain why it's uncool and dehumanizing to say people are mutilating their genitals with consensual and safe surgical procedures. If I was going to do that, then I'd just post in /r/theredpill because nobody but you thinks that way here.