• InevitableSwing [none/use name]
    ·
    9 months ago

    While the decision was unanimous, the liberal justices wrote a sharp concurrence that accused the conservative majority of going further than needed

    Oh, my. Hohoohohooooooyhooasfoohooasfoi;jmsdkl;fmn iwaek ln sdaf oh shit.as.d fasdf'ojka;sdmkaf kjasdfiiidiiiiiiiiiiii                      oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooasd

    • itappearsthat
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have never read a harder cope sentence than "sharp concurrence". Like we make fun of these people for fetishizing losing and dissent, now they fetishize agreeing? What the actual fuck lmao?

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
        ·
        9 months ago

        I like etymology and looking things up. But I don't think I even did a quickie google of the judge/justice use of "concurrence" because legal shit can be so tedious.

        ---

        Nina edit

        TIL - there's something even more lib than a "withering dissent". A "sharp concurrence" is the most lib thing possible. I thought a concurring opinion might be complicated. Nope. It's very simple.

        Concurring opinion

        In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision.

        • D61 [any]
          ·
          9 months ago

          "A sternly unpleasant glare" dennis-stare

          • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sotomayor Raised an Eyebrow after EVERY Ruling by Supercilious plays.

            ---

            supercilious [] Etymology: early 1500s from Latin superciliosus "haughty", from supercilium "eyebrow".