UlyssesT [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agoNo, the boomers are *not* okay, and they weren't okay in the 1970s either. CW: kiddie creeping, misogyny, and much much moreexternal-linkmessage-square84 fedilinkarrow-up1109file-text
arrow-up1109external-linkNo, the boomers are *not* okay, and they weren't okay in the 1970s either. CW: kiddie creeping, misogyny, and much much moreUlyssesT [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agomessage-square84 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCthulhusIntern [he/him]hexbear20·edit-22 years agoBased on the sources I'm reading, child pornography was not specifically made illegal until 1977 in the United States, and even then, it was minors under 16 until 1984... (before that, it usually just fell under obscenity laws). Is this true? link
minus-squaressjmarx [he/him]hexbear5·2 years ago If law enforcement concludes an image of a child to be sexually arousing, then these laws can subject that individual to punishment link
minus-squareNephewAlphaBravo [he/him]hexbear4·2 years ago Cops can choose not to punish child porn :amerikkka: :stalin-gun-1: link
Based on the sources I'm reading, child pornography was not specifically made illegal until 1977 in the United States, and even then, it was minors under 16 until 1984... (before that, it usually just fell under obscenity laws). Is this true?
yup
:amerikkka: :stalin-gun-1: