• FloridaBoi [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      They only have two levers: money supply and interest rates

      Source: I took the Econ AP exam 18 years ago

    • Steve2 [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      You could just do a Keynes-style thing and start massive projects to provide employment at low interest rates, we all know how shitty all the infrastructure is and how much needs to be done for supply chains. But yeah, if you give up on government actually directing anything then you just get nothing. Feels weird living in the time period future marxists will say "disproved" neoliberalism (same way the 30s disproved classical economics and the 70s disproved a lot of Keynes' assumptions).

      • Sushi_Desires
        ·
        2 years ago

        we all know how shitty all the infrastructure is

        I am literally afraid to drive over bridges and overpasses these days, it's ridiculous

    • Thomas_Dankara [any,comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      neoliberals not understanding that employment is more important than interest rates

      neoliberals keep unemployment high on purpose to maintain a reserve army of labor. this suppresses wages, and creates a bunch of desperate people who will scab in the event of labor unrest.

      neoliberals care about interest rates more than unemployment because M - C - M transactions are inherently usurous and how capitalists make their money.

        • Thomas_Dankara [any,comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          what @MolotovHalfEmpty said, but I'd also add some context

          for most people, the purpose of trade is to exchange commodities of equal value. You have shoes you don't need, but you need a new shirt. you sell your shoes, get money (the medium of exchange) and use that money to buy a shirt. money only serves as a medium of exchange rather than an end unto itself. But capitalists wish to profit rather than exchange fairly. so they buy cheap and sell dear. They sit on commodities until there is a shortage. Or they charge interest. For most people, their transactions are C-M-C. They wish to get rid of a commodity they have too many of, and get a commodity of equal value they have need of. But they don't wish to run around all day bartering so they use money as a medium of exchange. The capitalist however starts off with money, and desires to end with more money. The money they end with has to be more than the money they start with so they're always looking to get the upper hand in any exchange. They're not looking for fair exchange but unfair exchange. It would be pointless to buy shoes for $5 and sell them for $5. The point of an MCM exchange is to buy something for X amount of money and sell it for greater than that amount. The capitalist wishes to accumulate money because it represents infinite potential. Its only use value is to buy commodities but because commodities fluctuate in price, it makes sense for the capitalist to throw their money back into circulation over and over again to take advantage of the fluctuating prices of commodities and end up with more money than they started out with.

          this is all stuff marx talks about in Das Kapital

          to tie it back into the thread this is why capitalists care so much about interest rates. High interest rates means it's easier to profit from investment. People with money make more money by virtue of simply having money. People without money go further into debt by virtue of needing money. They also like high unemployment because it means desperate workers unlikely to strike are in good supply.

          on rare occasion capitalists care about CMC more than MCM, for example when hyperinflation happens and it suddenly becomes necessary to get rid of all their money and to instead buy up important commodities (like food, water and fuel) when people are in dire need of them.

          • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Top explainer :marx-ok:

            Mine was a bit lazy concise as it's dead late here and I need to go to bed. :sleepi:

        • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Money - Commodity - Money

          Basically any business transaction where capital buys something and then sells it for more than that. Capital accumulation by that method.

    • supdog [e/em/eir,ey/em]
      ·
      2 years ago

      why do you think that? 5 years of 6% unemployment sounds more survivable to me continued 13% inflation.

        • supdog [e/em/eir,ey/em]
          ·
          2 years ago

          no doubt but inflation is also doing that.

          The thing that maybe makes inflation a different beast is that rates get locked in if people expect it to continue. You sign a lease for a year, mortgages go on for years. You commit to 13%.

          I don't know how unemployment is worse than inflation for sure though.

      • DinosaurThussy [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Inflation is felt much more widely than unemployment and puts more pressure on businesses to cooperate with labor. Unemployment localizes discontent to those it immediately affects. Everyone feels inflation. So they’re trading a problem which the affluent experience for one that they don’t

        • supdog [e/em/eir,ey/em]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Unemployment localizes discontent to those it immediately affects.

          and this also has upsides right? It's a targetable group. There's nothing like unemployment insurance for the entire price level.

          Also the great recession lasted a few years of high unemployment but it's not like it was the same 20 million people from 2008-2012. It was higher rates of layoffs so that 20 million had different people in it from one quarter to the next. Still not localized discontent. A recession IS felt broadly, that's what makes it a recession.

            • supdog [e/em/eir,ey/em]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I got laid off from covid and it basically derailed me so I get it

              If we're talking egalitarianism here, the most marginalized already aren't employed. Employment favoring policies aren't doing much for the disabled, the elderly, the unhoused, the undocumented.

                • supdog [e/em/eir,ey/em]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  you say "why throw more bodies on the pile?" as though people outside the labor force getting incinerated by inflation for the sake of perpetual full employment and perpetual growth wouldn't also be bodies.

                  This doesn't seem like the same site that mocks the line go up business ideology. If you don't think there's a recession to balance out the excess then you're just on that :free-real-estate: