• UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    deleted by creator

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If it feels on the nose, it might be thanks to the governance style over the last year and a half.

      Biden's had a laser-like focus on two things: War in the Ukraine and the Jan 6th Riot. He's yet to find a police budget he doesn't want to inflate. He's far more concerned with international trade relations than domestic stability or growth. He's so riggedly fixated on Law & Order politics that he might as well be endorsing all the shitty SCOTUS decisions.

      If the country has an extreme NWO vibe to it right now, that's just Biden's America, baby.

      • soy_disantra [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        excuse me sir you're talking about THE MOST PROGRESSIVE PRESIDENT IN HISTORY right now, please check yourself 💅

    • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Could definitely see some making anti-interventionist arguments because of that phrase, given how politically the gop is.

  • Pastaguini [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was so sure that this was a fake quote or somehow taken out of context or something. I thought there was no way that they would intentionally phrase it like a right wing forum post. But they did. Incredible lack of communication strategy and awareness.

      • yellowparenti5 [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        wtf does that even mean
        are they turning the friggin frogs gay? (for the record i think alex jones is a disinfo agent)

        • Civility [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          :yea:

          The tragic part about the turning the "they're putting chemicals in the water to friggin frogs gay "bit is that it came from a series of environmental science studies showing that exposure to even very low levels of Atrazine, the second most common pesticide in the US, screws with frogs endochrine to the extent it can cause them to be intersex and/or unable to succesfully reproduce.

          And now thanks to people like :alex-supplements: it's really hard to talk about without sounding like a homophobe or right-wing conspiracy theorist.

  • Shoegazer [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    probably best to not say shit like "world order" when your opponents think you're decapitating babies in the basements of restaurants and JFK will be resurrected to rescue them from your sins

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      He's got Clintonite Foreign Policy Brain. Still thinks we're living at the American Hegemonic Peak of 1993. If we're decapitating babies or bombing hospitals or raping nuns, you're just supposed to nod and smile and insist its all part of a bigger picture that the rubes don't understand.

  • AcidSmiley [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Destroy the liberal world order and save money on gas with this one weird trick!

    • RonaldMcReagan [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago
      click here to find out more!

      :fidel-cool::lenin-shining::stalin-shining::mao-shining::rosa-shining::xi-shining::kropotkin-big:

  • Binguz2 [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Months spent developing the phrase "Ultra Maga," zero time spent telling Biden to never say something like "Liberal World Order"

    • CTHlurker [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I imagine that every republican strategist just had a spontaneous orgasm when that was first uttered to the press.

  • Flaps [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The liberal world order can suck my nuts

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    gosh I wonder why working people don't feel like it's worth the time to vote

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    deleted by creator

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    "Let them eat cake"

    They're sowing the seeds of their own destruction along with everyone else.

  • 20000bannedposters [love/loves]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well at least they have stopped saying all options are on the table.

    Wonder if Russia would even engage with us again

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Russia and China have for the last 15 years stupidly thought that the West would cooperate with them to prosper together.

          I don't think either country's leaders have believed that in the last decade. But back in the 90s, yeah. Chinese leadership - particularly the wing of the party lead by Bo Xilai - were convinced they would become the next Japan. The Russians, under Yeltsin, assumed they would be incorporated into the larger EU sphere just like Estonia and Poland and Eastern Germany.

          But by the 2010s? No. It was abundantly clear to everyone that the US was in this game to divide and conquer. You could either be a collection of mismanaged micro-states like in Central America or the Saudi peninsula. Or you could be an ammo dumping ground, like in Afghanistan or Iraq.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I'm sure they'll engage with the next guy, particularly if its a DeSantis style Conservative.

      Republicans want to pivot to Asia and do Ukraine-tier shit to the Pacific Rim. They're generally sympathetic towards the white nationalists in Eastern Europe. They mostly consider the Poland/Hungary/Ukraine a place to hook up with :epstein: grade girlfriends. They hate the UN and other Western European states for being full of icky socialists. And Russians are fucking loaded, so you know there's money in lobbying and triangulating business deals on their behalf. Same as the Saudis or the Turks.

      I think we should expect yet another Russian Reset under the next President, just like we had under the last four.