It did have fanservice moments that were cringe, but other than that, yes, it was wonderful. Its years-later extra seasons "Revolution" and "Evolution R" were actually quite nice too.
Do you like, even watch anime at this point? Do you think when the average Japanese person watched Demon Slayer they were frustrated that the story featured younger characters instead of some 35yo salary man?
Do you think when millions of people watched SpyxFamily which predominantly featured a child as a main character last season they were instead reminiscing on the good old days of 1980s anime?
All of the criticism about the pedo side of the industry is all fine, accurate and justified, but this sort of circle jerk is realy just pathetic honestly.
It is almost like we need daily reminders that most people in Japan don't actualy care about Cowboy Bebop and Eva that much, and like it or not anime is made for them not us.
If you want to have a discussion that isn't the same circlejerk repeated without fail every time then maybe, maybe not, hey they even posted the Miyazaki quote elsewhere on the thread.
All media has gotten worse since the 70s in the US and the 90s in japan as the contradictions of capitlaism have intensified. The even the handfull of good anime are released despite thr market not because of it. The tears of the workers being being baked in only make it less worthy of faor consideration.
By contrast, the usual reactive circlejerk against treat criticism is fine and good, apparently. :very-intelligent:
My criticism of your entertainment doesn't threaten your entertainment. Your petty personal attacks in this thread don't even meaningfully protect that entertainment.
Since you conjured up an imaginary position where you're pretending I was demanding 35 year old salary men protagonists, I can just as easily (and probably more accurately) remind you that "adult" typically means 18 and older, and since so much contemporary anime that you seem to be angrily defending here is often focused on sexually objectifying dubiously-aged and often visibly childlike characters (or "looks, acts, and/or talks like a child but is actually a 1000 year old half dragon half angel half vampire" characters) for a number of reasons, what you seem to be defending is... questionable.
I also find abrasive and insult-laden personal attacks, all in some misguided (and unnecessary) defense of treats, to be "just pathetic honestly" as you put it first.
To use more of your own words, there is also frequent "circle jerk" of treat defending that often happens when the treats are criticized, usually with "let people enjoy things" thought terminating cliches and "touch grass" mantras in response of any/all criticism of some entertainment or another.
"It is almost like" I find your insulting reply petty and vindictive, and consequently, I will dismiss your hostility and continue criticizing the treats if I feel the treats deserve criticism.
The treats are not endangered by my criticism, and for that matter they aren't even protected in any meaningful way by your personal attacks.
I still contend that in the balance that visibly adult characters were more common before the turn of the century. Also, while on the surface teenagers may be the stated audience, the fanservice-drenched merch-associated slop is consistently made for the same targeted group of big-spender otaku and on average they aren't getting any younger.
That's generally caused because nobody really ages out of watching the teen targeted stuff. Even today you can slap a 30+year old in front of Pokemon and they'll enjoy it like they were young and watching the first series again.
Since the older group doesn't age out but you still want to target the younger group, not much reason to exclude an audience by targeting only the older group.
All these decisions are economic. Especially in anime these days which is ruthlessly run by the publishing committees.
I still argue there's timeless kid-friendly stuff like Pokemon then there's fanservice-loaded kiddie-creeping stuff that can say "for teens" when the real revenue source (and they know it) is aging otaku.
That's true but it's caused by the same effect. It doesn't hurt the teen audience but it does attract the adult audience, also provides internet marketing through sharing shit.
This is in fact also a problem in western media imo. More and more content is hyper-sexualised even targeted at younger audiences because the older audience watches the franchise still and never stopped.
None of the kids tv network targeted at teens ever was, Disney, Nickelodeon, even Cartoon Network. All the shows have teens or sometimes younger in them.
But this is the same era as the era of anime we're talking about. He-Man is 80s.
The point is how much it has changed. A lot of people will get the wrong perspective on new content in the west because of marvel movies, but the marvel shit is all a holdover from the 80s too.
Remember when many more anime characters looked visibly like adults? :pathetic:
Anime design peaked in the late 90s-early 00s
Slayers was a great show.
Even if Lina's outfit was horrid. It was such a great show
:downbear:
Headband, giant orbs, clashing colors. I apologize for nothing.
What about Naga's outfit? :volcel-judge:
That it would only work in a world with fucking magic.
Fortunately, that world had plenty of it.
It did have fanservice moments that were cringe, but other than that, yes, it was wonderful. Its years-later extra seasons "Revolution" and "Evolution R" were actually quite nice too.
Do you like, even watch anime at this point? Do you think when the average Japanese person watched Demon Slayer they were frustrated that the story featured younger characters instead of some 35yo salary man?
Do you think when millions of people watched SpyxFamily which predominantly featured a child as a main character last season they were instead reminiscing on the good old days of 1980s anime?
All of the criticism about the pedo side of the industry is all fine, accurate and justified, but this sort of circle jerk is realy just pathetic honestly.
It is almost like we need daily reminders that most people in Japan don't actualy care about Cowboy Bebop and Eva that much, and like it or not anime is made for them not us.
We need a daily reminder? This is so important we need to set aside a part of every day to meditate on this fact?
If you want to have a discussion that isn't the same circlejerk repeated without fail every time then maybe, maybe not, hey they even posted the Miyazaki quote elsewhere on the thread.
All media has gotten worse since the 70s in the US and the 90s in japan as the contradictions of capitlaism have intensified. The even the handfull of good anime are released despite thr market not because of it. The tears of the workers being being baked in only make it less worthy of faor consideration.
By contrast, the usual reactive circlejerk against treat criticism is fine and good, apparently. :very-intelligent:
My criticism of your entertainment doesn't threaten your entertainment. Your petty personal attacks in this thread don't even meaningfully protect that entertainment.
Since you conjured up an imaginary position where you're pretending I was demanding 35 year old salary men protagonists, I can just as easily (and probably more accurately) remind you that "adult" typically means 18 and older, and since so much contemporary anime that you seem to be angrily defending here is often focused on sexually objectifying dubiously-aged and often visibly childlike characters (or "looks, acts, and/or talks like a child but is actually a 1000 year old half dragon half angel half vampire" characters) for a number of reasons, what you seem to be defending is... questionable.
I also find abrasive and insult-laden personal attacks, all in some misguided (and unnecessary) defense of treats, to be "just pathetic honestly" as you put it first.
To use more of your own words, there is also frequent "circle jerk" of treat defending that often happens when the treats are criticized, usually with "let people enjoy things" thought terminating cliches and "touch grass" mantras in response of any/all criticism of some entertainment or another.
"It is almost like" I find your insulting reply petty and vindictive, and consequently, I will dismiss your hostility and continue criticizing the treats if I feel the treats deserve criticism.
The treats are not endangered by my criticism, and for that matter they aren't even protected in any meaningful way by your personal attacks.
Still true if you stick to seinen, everything else is targeted at teenagers so it looks like them too.
I still contend that in the balance that visibly adult characters were more common before the turn of the century. Also, while on the surface teenagers may be the stated audience, the fanservice-drenched merch-associated slop is consistently made for the same targeted group of big-spender otaku and on average they aren't getting any younger.
That's generally caused because nobody really ages out of watching the teen targeted stuff. Even today you can slap a 30+year old in front of Pokemon and they'll enjoy it like they were young and watching the first series again.
Since the older group doesn't age out but you still want to target the younger group, not much reason to exclude an audience by targeting only the older group.
All these decisions are economic. Especially in anime these days which is ruthlessly run by the publishing committees.
I still argue there's timeless kid-friendly stuff like Pokemon then there's fanservice-loaded kiddie-creeping stuff that can say "for teens" when the real revenue source (and they know it) is aging otaku.
That's true but it's caused by the same effect. It doesn't hurt the teen audience but it does attract the adult audience, also provides internet marketing through sharing shit.
This is in fact also a problem in western media imo. More and more content is hyper-sexualised even targeted at younger audiences because the older audience watches the franchise still and never stopped.
No arguments there. Western media is :awooga: obsessed too, but with an extra large additional helping of violence on top of that.
Counterpoint, in america media aimed at teenagers is full of only adults.
None of the kids tv network targeted at teens ever was, Disney, Nickelodeon, even Cartoon Network. All the shows have teens or sometimes younger in them.
He-man and GI were mostly afults. Every teen drama has actors that are like 30+
Bonus: GI Joe is anime.
But this is the same era as the era of anime we're talking about. He-Man is 80s.
The point is how much it has changed. A lot of people will get the wrong perspective on new content in the west because of marvel movies, but the marvel shit is all a holdover from the 80s too.
Good counterpoint
deleted by creator